Conclusion Continued.
The table represents the blending of Collaborative roles in each of my Case Studies.
Hayden and Windsor. “Collaboration and the Composer: Case Studies from the End of the 20th Century.” Tempo, vol. 61, no. 240, Cambridge University Press, 2007, pp. 28–39. CITE>>>>>
Directive: provided notations have the traditional functions as instructions for the musicians by the composer. The traditional hierarchy of composer and performer(s) aims to completely determine the performance through the score.
Interactive: The composer is involved more directly in negotiation with musicians. The process is more interactive, discursive and reflective, with more input from collaborators than in the directive category, but ultimately, the composer is still the author. Some aspects of the performance are more ‘open’ and not determined by the score.
Collaborative: The development of the music is achieved through a collective decision making process. There is no singular or hierarchy of roles.