Tip

Moving the mouse cursor over the top of the page will display the menu bar.

Pedal points and drones are present in almost all musical genres and styles. Although they appear in a whole variety of ways, and can have very diverse effects, music analysis rarely pays attention to these differences. The reason is, perhaps, that there are no defined concepts that would provide vocabulary to both describe and understand the power of sustained notes. My first research question addresses the ‘working’ of pedals and drones: How can we explain the perceptual difference among instances of pedal tones and drones? In searching for the right perspective to tackle this question I have come to two concepts that inspired the further research. The first is the concept of expectation. It is mostly promoted by the writings of Leonard B. Meyer (in the more recent time it is researched and developed by others), which I take as conceptual frame. The second is the concept of interactions that defines and organizes the musical events. The inspiration for the latter came from the social studies. The two concepts are interrelated: the expectation is a product of interactions of musical elements, and the expectations are also involved in interactions, thereby influencing the perception and understanding of a musical piece. My following research questions are: Could the concept of musical expectation and the concept of interaction help explain the power of long notes? If yes, in which ways can these processes influence the perception of pedals and drones? In the process of research, I have concluded that there are several categories of pedals/drones that are not labeled in music theory but are recognizable by many music theorists and musicians. Pointing at these categories and defining them could provide us with more words in pedal/drone-vocabulary. On the other hand, in case these models are recognizable as such, they have the potential to engage in various interactions with the other musical events in the piece, influencing the listener’s understanding of it. From this perspective, it is relevant to examine them. The current research aims at pointing at a number of such models. To define them, I have used the concepts of expectations and interactions. Music analysis of the chosen models and a number of musical fragments are so presenting the practical application of my theoretical research.

Tip

This page contains media that is intended to start playback automatically on opening. This may include sound. Your browser is blocking automated playback. Please click here to start media.

  • contents
    • Abstract
    • Foreword
    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. Literature overview
    • 3. 'Too long' notes
    • 4. Interactions
    • 5. MODELS
    • . Harmonic pedal
    • . Dominant pedal
    • . Opening tonic pedal
    • . Opening dominant pedal
    • . Closing tonic pedal
    • . Sectional dominant pedal
    • . Cadenza
    • . Melodic pedal
    • . Folk drone
    • . Rhythmic pedal in the accompanying voices
    • . Metrical support
    • . Foundational drone
    • . Textural drone
    • 6. PEDAL STORIES: Prolonged pedal
    • . Harmonic pedal or foundational drone
    • . Integrated pedal
    • . Harmonic pedal or 'standing on the dominant'?
    • . Movable pedal
    • . Drone illusions
    • . Epilogue: 'Pedal-effect'
    • 7. CASE STUDIES: Beethoven
    • . Case Studies: Ravel
    • . Case Studies: Brahms
    • 8. Conclusion
    • 9. References
    • Ida Vujović
  • navigation
    overview
  • abstract
    Pedal points and drones are present in almost all musical genres and styles. Although they appear in a whole variety of ways, and can have very diverse effects, music analysis rarely pays attention to these differences. The reason is, perhaps, that there are no defined concepts that would provide vocabulary to both describe and understand the power of sustained notes. My first research question addresses the ‘working’ of pedals and drones: How can we explain the perceptual difference among instances of pedal tones and drones? In searching for the right perspective to tackle this question I have come to two concepts that inspired the further research. The first is the concept of expectation. It is mostly promoted by the writings of Leonard B. Meyer (in the more recent time it is researched and developed by others), which I take as conceptual frame. The second is the concept of interactions that defines and organizes the musical events. The inspiration for the latter came from the social studies. The two concepts are interrelated: the expectation is a product of interactions of musical elements, and the expectations are also involved in interactions, thereby influencing the perception and understanding of a musical piece. My following research questions are: Could the concept of musical expectation and the concept of interaction help explain the power of long notes? If yes, in which ways can these processes influence the perception of pedals and drones? In the process of research, I have concluded that there are several categories of pedals/drones that are not labeled in music theory but are recognizable by many music theorists and musicians. Pointing at these categories and defining them could provide us with more words in pedal/drone-vocabulary. On the other hand, in case these models are recognizable as such, they have the potential to engage in various interactions with the other musical events in the piece, influencing the listener’s understanding of it. From this perspective, it is relevant to examine them. The current research aims at pointing at a number of such models. To define them, I have used the concepts of expectations and interactions. Music analysis of the chosen models and a number of musical fragments are so presenting the practical application of my theoretical research.
  • Ida Vujović - The Power of Long Notes - 2017
  • Meta
  • Comments
  • Terms

foreword

abstract

prolonged pedal

CONCLUSION

references

THE POWER OF LONG NOTES

INTRODUCTION

interactions

epilogue

literature overview

'too long' notes

drone illusions

movable pedal

metrical support

integrated pedal

harmonic pedal or 'standing on the dominant'?

harmonic pedal or foundational drone?

foundational drone

rhythmic pedal

textural drone

folk drone

models - introduction

harmonic pedal

melodic pedal

cadenza

dominant pedal

sectional D-pedal

opening T-pedal

opening D-pedal

closing T-pedal

Beethoven

Ravel

Brahms

Ida Vujović

 

Master Music Theory

The Royal Conservatoire,

The Hague (NL)

June, 2017

title page