Process of 'archiving' is perhaps my main fixed hate, but in a paradoxical twist, it is also my main concern in the topic of my research.
In being aware of the cycle of an action I aim to give value to all stages of an action, not just its final end-product. In the struggle of how to communicate this I started to think that I need to use the form of archive - however limiting I find that - to subvert and question it as a form.
How to create an archive system that communicates the true nature of my research?
I'm not interested in objective documentation, I want the approach that I have to exude further than the work itself - to how it is documented, classified, archived and thus presented.