Figure #13 and #14: Joints

Each figure consists of three elongated structures with three joints. The lower part of the arm comprises two 1 cm wide two-dimensional outlines attached to large HDT5 pulleys rotating around an axle. The joint is rotated by a smaller timing belt pulley driven by a brushless DC motor. The lower part of the figure consists of two parallel, flat, 3d printed sides. It creates a structure that has depth, but depth created using flat surfaces.

About one quarter of the distance up the lower arm, two more motors are mounted on either side of the figure to which long timing belts are tightened around two pulleys halfway up the figure's total length. These allow each side of the top part of the figure to rotate independently. The top section also consists of two flat sections. By rotating the two top sections the angles of these is adjustable relative to each other and relative to the lower part of the arm. The top arm segments can pass through the gap between the two sides of the lower part of the arm making complete rotations possible.

The figures are placed on a rotary base giving each a total of four degrees of motion.

#13 and 14 are the first figures that make use of a closed-loop control system.1 There is an encoder mounted on each driving motor, allowing precise position control. This is achieved using O-drive2 brushless motor controllers in combination with CUI high-resolution encoders.3

By adjusting the motors' force, the figures become compliant, meaning that a human performer could manipulate the joints. The encoders' position can then be read and mapped to other figures' motion, sound generating devices or lights.

Impetus

The creation of these two figures was motivated by a perceived need for greater dynamism of motion than previous figures. They were designed to employ more powerful actuator systems and to have a large range of motion.

Figures #13 and 14 displays the origin shared by most of the figures; a drawing. To me they seem like they have not quite made the transition from two-dimensional drawing to three-dimensional figure. Like parts of them remain in Flatland. They are like continuously transforming drawings.

Placing two parallel surfaces next to each other creates a sense of limited three-dimensionality. To me, a drawing evocates absent realities, and I hoped for these figures that they would be able to do the same even as three-dimensional entities.

The two-dimensional imprint of the figures in the shadows they cast when illuminated expands these figures' dimensionality. It draws out a more significant textural variation than is apparent in the figures themselves.