Conclusions


In the course of this text, I presented a new music notation of harmony, rhythm, and dynamics for machine learning, based on multidimensional data matrices. I introduced a new taxonomy of periodic musical progressions inspired by Shepard tones and provided a proof that any music notated in this notation, can be analysed as a set of modified periodic progressions. The main benefit of the proposed system is the possibility of using it with AI for comparative analysis, re-synthesis and training machine learning models. What is more, the system can be directly used for music composition and analysis.


Some of the presented solutions, like the analysis algorithm, are at the early stage of development. The primary reason to develop them, is to provide a new tool for myself and other musicians in the form of a new computer software. To me as a composer, developing it is at the same time an artistic, and scientific effort, although my main motivation is artistic, not technological. In the near future, a faster algorithm for analysis based on the principles of the taxonomy should be developed, predicting the smallest amount of needed elements for analysis of the music progression. The method should be further tested in artistic practice for creative examples of music composed with Periodic Musical Elements.

 

Bibliography


Brandi, Giuseppe, and T. Di Matteo. 2021. “Predicting Multidimensional Data via Tensor Learning.” Journal of Computational Science, July, 101372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2021.101372.

“Brute Force Algorithm - Oxford Reference.” n.d. Oxford Reference. Accessed April 20, 2022. https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095532553.

Burns, Edward M. 1981. “Circularity in Relative Pitch Judgments for Inharmonic Complex Tones: The Shepard Demonstration Revisited, Again.” Perception & Psychophysics, no. 5 (September): 467–72. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03204843.

Deutsch, Diana. 2010. “The Paradox of Pitch Circularity.” Acoustics Today, no. 3 (July): 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3488670.

Dunne, Edward, and Mark Mcconnell. 1999. “Pianos and Continued Fractions.” Mathematics Magazine, no. 2 (April): 104–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/0025570x.1999.11996712.

Hofstadter, Douglas R. 2000. Gödel, Escher, Bach. Penguin Group(CA).

Lewin, David. 2010. Generalized Musical Intervals and Transformations. Oxford University Press, USA.

Liu, Qiong, and Ying Wu. 2012. “Supervised Learning.” In Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, 3243–45. Springer US. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_451.

Luque, Sergio. 2009. “The Stochastic Synthesis of Iannis Xenakis.” Leonardo Music Journal, December, 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1162/lmj.2009.19.77.

Oord, Aäron van den, Sander Dieleman, Heiga Zen, Karen Simonyan, Oriol Vinyals, Alex Graves, Nal Kalchbrenner, Andrew W. Senior and Koray Kavukcuoglu. “WaveNet: A Generative Model for Raw Audio.” ArXiv abs/1609.03499 (2016): n. pag.

Schat, Peter. 2012. Tone Clock. Routledge.

Shepard, Roger N. 1964. “Circularity in Judgments of Relative Pitch.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, no. 12 (December): 2346–53. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1919362.
 
Smith, Steven W. 1999. The Scientist and Engineer’s Guide to Digital Signal Processing.


, "Pitch and rhythm paradoxes: Comments on ‘‘Auditory paradox based on fractal waveform’’ [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 79, 186–189 (1986)]", The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 80, 961 962 (1986) https://doi.org/10.1121/1.393919

Sathya, R., and Annamma Abraham. 2013. “Comparison of Supervised and Unsupervised Learning Algorithms for Pattern Classification.” International Journal of Advanced Research in Artificial Intelligence, no. 2. https://doi.org/10.14569/ijarai.2013.020206.

 

Wang, Bryan, and Yi-Hsuan Yang. 2019. “PerformanceNet: Score-to-Audio Music Generation with Multi-Band Convolutional Residual Network.” Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, July, 1174–81. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33011174.

 

Xenakis, Iannis. 1992. Formalized Music. Pendragon Press.

 

 

Fig. 17. Fractal of Periodic Musical Elements, first 100 sampling rates