photo © MAK Wien

Elena Peytchinska & Thomas Ballhausen

 

New Ecology of the Book

[1] We enter a book as we enter a room. Here, we do not rely on the promise of the geometrically describable volume of the book-object and its cuboid extension built of walls and angles. Even if the dialogue of the spatial diagonal is only sometimes measurable, its predictability does not tell the whole story. In the book-room, we encounter expected and unexpected multiplicities: the layers emerging from the familiar sequence of numbered pages, and the startling unexpectedness of positions and positioning. Thus, the topological description of the book-room is one of "becoming-relation": the book which is yet to come, the "becoming book-with"... This is not a question of orientation, but of co-ordination. Is there a new point of spatial reference? A new centre? Yet the capacity for mathematical describability—geometrical or topological—is troubled by the presence of the book-body.

[4] In Times of Crises, Michel Serres defines ecology as an "inextricably difficult discipline." Not so much an ideological or political science, but rather a discipline that includes all life forms (and their sciences): "everything that is caused and causing, coded and coding." Such a gesture of inclusion is undoubtedly a risky and turbulent matter—its spatial articulation as risky and turbulent, as uneven and unpredictable. A spatiality fragmented into locations, positions, directions, layers—embedded in harmonious and friendly, as well as turbulent and uncomfortable patches, the margins of which do not fit together. In tracing these margins, we create a map that is as real as the "world" itself, reminiscent of Borges’s fictional account Of Exactitude in Science—a map as large as the territory it represents. Borges’s map envelops the land it is meant to measure like a skin. Map and landscape touch one another so tightly, so accurately, and so rigorously that the distance between them, in scale or meaning, evaporates.

[2] The book-body transcends the borders of its geometrical self: we are captured by its rhythm, which merges with the rhythm of our own bodies—writing, reading, walking. The book-body, informed by the multilayered spatio-textual experience of its geometrical-topological articulations, invents, produces, and performs an environment in which it is embedded. There, it encounters other book-bodies—dancing and pulsating in the pace of their referentiality. There, theory becomes a matter of matter, of sliding and percolation. This environment does not circle around a centre but spaces itself in the hyperpolyphonic word-worldscapes inhabited by our books. It is, instead, a ramble-ment—a rumbling ramble-ment—sliding along, walking with, and strolling around a plethora of layers, functions, fictions, frictions, species, and materialities. There, sound and noise mimic each other.

Michel Serres: Times of Crisis: What the Financial Crisis Revealed and How to Reinvent our Lives and Future [Translation: Anne-Marie Feenberg-Dibon]. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing 2014 [2009], p. 61-62.

Jorge Luis Borges: "Of Exactitude in Science". In: A Universal History of Infamy [Translation: Norman Thomas di Giovanni]. Penguin Books 1975, p.131.

[3] Two theoretical influences co-constitute our approach to an "ecology of the book": the Material Ecocriticism of Serenella Iovino and Serpil Oppermann (particularly the notion of "matter-text," coined by Başak Ağin) and Michel Serres's understanding of ecology. The field of ecocriticism measures the correspondence between "word-world" and "actual world," or, in the words of Laurence Buell, ecocriticism is about "the matching or non-matching of wordscape and worldscape that takes quite varied forms." Material Ecocriticism challenges this differentiation by considering the articulation of matter not only in a text but as a text. "Mattertext" is, therefore, the text-body embedded in world-matter.

[5] Our maps are more-than-texts. They recall the primordial textures of space that emerge through the practices of tracing, of walking, of writing. We are weaving these ancient spatial practices anew. ("There is nothing quite so old as the gesture of making new," declares Christopher Watkin.) As a porous membrane between the world and the site of its textual production, our more-than-texts unfold as a space-skin. Is this space-skin the de-centred, distributed spatiality—and practice—of a new ecology?

Başak Ağin: »Animated Film as an Eloquent Body: Seth Boyden’s ›An Object at Rest‹ as Mattertext«. In: Manisa Celal Bayar University Journal of Social Sciences. Environment and Literature Special Issue, Vol. 16, Nr. 1-2, 2018, S.27-45.

Lawrence Buell: The Future of Environmental Criticism: Environmental Crisis and Literary Imagination. Blackwell 2005, p.39.

Serenella Iovino & Serpil Oppermann: »Stories Comes to Matter«. In: Iovino, Serenella/Oppermann, Serpil (Eds.): Material Ecocriticism. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press 2014, p.2.

Christopher Watkin: Michel Serres. Figures of Thought. Edinburgh University Press 2020, p.195.