Theoretical Framework
This project is situated within the field of artistic research, understood as a distinct and generative form of knowledge-making grounded in experience and practice. Following Patricia Leavy, artistic research resists reducing art to illustration or case study, instead positioning creative processes as rigorous inquiry capable of articulating complexities of lived experience, sociopolitical realities, and material entanglements that conventional scientific or humanities methods often cannot address.^9
In tandem with material philosophy and ecological thought, clay emerges as an active participant in knowledge production rather than an inert medium. Building upon Bruno Latour’s “parliament of things,” the studio assembles clay, kilns, tools, food, bodies, and fire as collaborators in inquiry.^10 Karen Barad’s notion of intraaction reinforces that meaning and matter co-emerge through entangled processes.^11 Pedagogy is reframed as artistic research in the form of collective, embodied learning; attentive to material resistances and affordances.
Crucially, this project integrates pedagogical feedback models where teachers and students engage in iterative learning loops. This dialogic process, supported by extensive educational research, foregrounds reciprocal feedback as essential for deepening understanding and fostering agency.^12 Feedback is conceived not as top-down judgment but as an ongoing exchange in which students actively interpret, respond to, and generate feedback themselves. In this co-creative feedback loop, knowledge evolves dynamically through negotiation, reflection, and shared experimentation.
Ecological theorists Donna Haraway and Timothy Morton deepen the framework by challenging solutionist impulses and insisting on embracing contradictions and complexities intrinsic to ecological entanglement.^13 ^14 Haraway’s injunction to “stay with the trouble” and Morton’s concept of "dark ecology" support this artistic research stance, where contradictions serve as conditions of possibility rather than obstacles.
Anna Tsing’s conception of friction further illustrates how knowledge arises through uneven encounters, between surplus subway clay and commercial clay, institutional frameworks and student collectives, edible and sculptural forms, revealing artistic research as a site of unstable, affectively rich transformation.^15 As Patricia Leavy notes, this knowledge is experiential, emotional, and material.^16
By positioning clay as a “keything” in an ecology of practice, this project creates iterative feedback loops of making, teaching, and learning; anchored both materially and pedagogically. These loops resist hierarchies of knowing and foreground relationality, enabling artistic research to generate new epistemic spaces where knowledge lives simultaneously in material form, thought, and collective experience.