Collaboration - Interactivity

How is relationallity practiced?

Ethics and relationality - culures of consent / safeguarding

Ethical dimentions

Ways of knowing:

Personal (embodied, emotional, spiritual)

Identity

Family

Relationships

Education

Work

Hobbies

 

Personal positioning: https://www.researchcatalogue.net/view/1726729/1774809

Emergence

Brainstormin/ testing 

Conformation bias

PHASE III

Topics/Keywords

Bag/body/clothes anayses 

Personal positioning



PHASE I

* Iterating

* friction and contradiction (paradoxes)

* meta perspective of form/ medium 

* citically connecting

 

Anti-dogmatii, anarcy, militant (am brown)

Engages critique / institutional critique

Positive revolutionary -   

Pleasure activism  - adrienne maree brown

 

To make something collective there needs to be a mutual understanding for fruitful engagement and accessibility. For this I am developing a tool for essaying the first step is how to deal with knowledge in essaying, second step would be how to go from mapping to performative essaying. In the article: Essaying through knowledge perspectives and knowledge fragments I theorized how we start essaying thought mapping.

 

The results from the article lead me to researching collectivity in diverse ways, to investigate the relation between the personal and the other. This is still in full process.

Tools:

Reserach Catalogue


Other:

Movies

Songs

Books

Objects

What about fake news?

Nirav, creative incubatie

Nirav, Wakker zijn

Serendepity

Emergence

PHASE II

(link) 

(Subjective, intuitive, empirical, Emotional, spiritual, intangible, primary, lived experience, existential)

1: Subject - Experiential ways of knowing

 

How did I personally experience the topic in the past?

How do I personally experience the topic currently?

 

These can be:

- primary exeriences

- secondary expereinces (someone else close to you)

 

For instance

- diary entry 

- dreams

- memory (Anecdotes / situations / experienes)

- emotions / feelings

 

 

PHASE II COLLECTING kowledge fragments

1: Clustering knowledge fragments

 

clustering

 

Perform the knoledge fragments in the mind map;

- How do they relate? 

- What is the proximity to the topic/oject?

- What is the proximity to each other?

- Which ones can be clustered?

- feel free to add new keywords/synonyms in your mind map

 

 


 

 

PHASE III CLUSTERING

knowledge fragments


PHASE III CONSTELLATION

of knowledge fragments


10 min. Introduction 

10 min. Workshopping On bruises - silence

10 min. Workshopping On bruises - what is missing? 

10 min. Sharing + clustering

20 min. feedback 

 

Knowledge fragments

Post-it: pink: Rational ways of knowing 

Post-it yellow: experential ways of knowing 

 

Digital data: e.huurdeman@fontys.nl

 

Referencing: 

*          = anonymous

name  = only exposed to the group 

source = public referenc

(artistic, non-verbal, embodied)



2: Object - Sensorial ways of knowing

 

How does the topic sound?        (form = audio)

How does the topic feel?            (form = object tactility/material)

How does the topic look?            (form = visual)

How does the topic move?          (form = performative/video)

How does the topic tast/smell?   (form = sent/smell reference)

 

This part is not about discussing the questions, but expressing them in the requested form, start drawing, share sounds,exppress movements, try to work through through these forms. 

 

Record, video, draw, make a pictue or video

 

 

For instance: 

- songs / compositions 

- archive material 

-  

 

 

 

 

PHASE III CONSTALLATION

of knowledge fragments

Network, constellate, Structre, mapping, sampeling,narratief, sequesntie, sequence

 

sampling 

tussenruimtes

interaction

 

Choose a cluster

choose a form

 

Interact: how do the knowledge fragments interact? 

- Is there friction?

- Are there paradoxes?

 

 

Collective, colaborative

Connecting, interating, 

 

Sharing with others/public

 

Who can I ask to contribute to this essying topic/object?

 

 

 

 

PHASE III INTERACTING/

knowledge fragments

PHASE IIII (PER)FORMING

(Objective, Theoretical, discursive, cognitive, reasoning, logic, analytical)

3: Other - Rational ways of knowing

 

How does the topic relate to (theoretical) sources? 

 

Choose knowledge perspectives:

note: chose at least 2 you unfamiliar with

- historical perspective

- economical perspective

- etymological perspective

- political perspective

- material research perspective

- Law etc.

 

Different sources:

- news/media articles

- academic papers/books

- dictonary/etymological definitions

 

 

3: (Inter)relation / contextualisaition

of knowledge fragments

 

  • Who/what is this (object/topic) in relation to?

 

- who/what is affecteded?

- who/what has influence?

- who/what is included/excluded?

- What ways of knowing and what knowledge fields are there lacking/missing?

 

For instance:

- other people

- non-human animals

- nature

- materials

- technology