Answers became poems:
The function of the memory is not only to recall, reconstitute or reconcile the past but also to construct and represent the present.
Moving images are moulded to the shape of absent or imaginary beings, signalling from elsewhere in time and space.
The practice is not to systematise or to objectify memory, but to find a physical expression.
Questions became poems:
How does the architecture serve as a narrative of a memory?
How do the fragments of a place hold memories?
How can I create absence and evoke a sense of memory?
How to express vulnerability and temporality?
How to show the loop of transformation and transition?
How can I make the memory of a place relatable?
Where is the place for creation?
What am I creating, a space or a mise-en-scene?
How big is the installation?
Where do I want to put the viewer?
How can it be open-ended and fragmented, like memory itself?
What are the materials?
How can I materialise the memory of a place?
Everything started with a poem:
This room, how well I know it.
Now they’re renting it and the one next to it as offices.
The whole house has become an office building for agents, businessmen, companies.
I tried to write down some answers to my questions:
I want to put the viewers inside the memory of a place.
I want to project the image or fragments of a place.
I want to work with transparent/ translucent materials. (Ambiguity of memory)
I want to work in different layers. (Layers of memory and time)
I want to show the passage of time through light. (Transitory)
I want to work with a material with vanishing property. (The ephemeral nature of places and memory)