Reference: “Radikale Zärtlichkeit. Warum Liebe politisch ist.“ (2021) by Şeyda Kurt
Simultaneity of Radicality and Tenderness:
“In the main title of my book, I chose the term tenderness over love. Why? Tenderness and love are both substantives. But it seems to me, that the word tenderness underlies a more direct request- the one of actually acting tender. I see tenderness, where humans are tender with each other, very specific, and this tenderness can have many different forms. Still, it is always guided by an action: By talking, by looking, by a movement, that - depending on the agreement- doesn’t always has to be soft or cautious. It is about an action, that plays to another person, plays with him/her, affirmative and productive, without wanting to harm him/her. When thinking about tenderness, nobody thinks about violence.“
[...]
“I don’t want to only live tenderness in my own relationships, I want to question its conditions beyond that. Because you can’t talk about tenderness, while remain silent about violence beyond your own relationships.
The objective cannot just be tenderness. I want to think more consequently. It has to be about radical tenderness. I understand radical tenderness as a program of justice. A justice of tenderness in one’s own relationships, in the apparently most private scope and beyond that, is just possible, when it applies for everybody.“ (Kurt, 2021)
Intercorporeality
—> “to describe embodiment as intercorporeality is to emphasize that the experience of being embodied is never a private affair, but is always already mediated by our continual interactions with other human and non-human bodies’“ (p.5, Thinking through the skin)