As I show in my article "Kaksi peiliä: Jacques Lacanin optinen skeema ja havainnollistamisen haaste" (pdf above) Lacan successively recognized the limitations of optical schema and moved from optical mirroring relations to topological modellings in his theories of desiring subject. Whether and how this would be meaningful to relate to questions of diffraction, remains here an open question.
- contents
-
navigation
-
abstract
In this exposition I present a cluster of works with regard to their subtle interconnections, often not consciously constructed or intended in any particular ways at the time of their conception. The afterlife of these works, however, enact aesthetic intra-actions of their ensemble. Shedding light on some parts of this cavernous network of pressing matters I make an attempt of explicating the ways in which artistic thinking might get "diffracted" into many part-processes that are both divergent and entangled. In the course of my presentation, I try to be sensitive towards the fact that these strings of thinking are distributed in a complex manner across the divide of sensibility and intelligibility. In terms of the chosen approach this implies avoiding the use of discursive explanations as the main medium of explication. This "method", if it can be formalized as one, involves priorizing the material circumstances of particular articulations, both verbal and non-verbal, over content-oriented gestures of translation.
- Mika Elo - Some works and their afterlife - 2018
- Meta
- Comments
- Terms