On appreciation in aesthetic and creativity by artist(s)
What I want to clarify in this Artistic Research is that artists as creators rely on the viewer's individual understanding ability, towards like an attitude "As you like." by artist(s). Art objects and art are not "goods" that must be appreciated. Thereby who mediates between the art and the recipients today it calls consumers, is the art curator.
Who deals with the subject of appreciation in aesthetic academically hat is the aesthetician and the philosopher in their art criticism, and that is their cretivity.
For whom I / we (artist(s)) communicate through my and other artworks, generally, for those people. So that our artworks are a contribution to society for opening to the art world (Academy), which is not the commercial art market. Hence, I /we (artist(s)) are not an idol, but rather we are in a part of people, that is the avant-garde.
If the aesthetician explores the appreciation of art for others objectivity and generally, that is the kind of force towards other people, like in German Nazi art.
Nevertheless, philosophy of mind, its freedom and the judgment beyond the art object, aesthetic experience, beauty, etc are very difficult research only in aesthetics. (Limitation of psychology, and overlapping with philosophy of religion) From this aspect, Duchamps´ work of art even today is interesting.
Such as Benjamins` term "Aura", subjective reflection in mind, that he could not coined finally, is still open. Even though philosophy of mind is very important philosophical research towards autonomy. Benjamins` was (critical) culure and media theoritical research.
Even a monk says that human beings are human beings, which is not a "noble idea." , but rather something natural. However, this "naturality" is also very difficult to explore.
So, I explore human beings in transversal aesthetics, (...)
There are in every culture Philosophy of mind in the positive sense, such as esprit in French.
Most academicians interest in their idea and thesis, not in artwork itself. Thereby important is how they got the inspiration from the art object or other thesis for their new intellectual creation. But they cannot understand artistic techniques, process, and materials actually.
Today, the art historian categorises the art and creates a new art theory as -ism towards the philosophy, which makes a fashion in art for the art market as the art world generally, such as for the global art discourse.
The appreciation in aesthetic is generally for their thesis and the academic discourse. Some of are the political discourse for society.
Thereby the artistic research is the research of art by artist(s) for something new (in and or with which regards to actuality), by ourselves individually and autonomically.
In Germany, I think that in the arts and culture, there is least immigration, whom from Asia and Africa I know, they studied at Technical university in Germany, they wanted to become the engineer, and the medical technical staff, not the artist, because who has the profession as the artist had studied in the study of the Western Arts and who works in the branch of the entertainment generally. The diploma engineer, and the medical technical staff are higher salary in Germany, there is no discrimination like in a brunch of the Western (European) Arts.
Ancient Greek Artefact:
The materials, I purchased in Greece, that is a type I have never seen in the Central European collection. I feel that this is the real thing. The material is in Greek, so it's difficult to proceed with researching. Today, Ancient Greek archiorogical study is better in Greece, I think that due to the EU. However, there is Ancient Greek study at the Universitiy of Warsaw, was really interesting. They had the influence from Ancient Greek culture through jewish people. (The Jews were moving back and forth between the south and the north (Today's Poland). Ancient Greek culture remained in the old Greek culture.).
For me, art is media, through art, I can see the human history. I am not art supreme principle, not "art for art's sake", and not such as by Victor Cousin "Du vrai du beau et du bien". Picasso's Guernica, I think that it's an error in itself, was Picasso's idea. Picasso's painting has really higher value, it means the very higher price in the auction, but Picasso did not touch anything for the auction price of his painting. He explored cubism, and he was in the out of art academy. It is the entanglement of the (Western) global art world.
To be honest, I don't think Rembrandt is "good at painting.", because there was and there is no criterium for it. He was the master, but he was not the master as he could paint good. There was and there is no judgment for who can paint good. What is interesting in his painting to me, that is the allegory and the composition in his painting, such as the allegory of smell (sense). In art, there was and is the subject, but the most important is the leitmotif, whether it will appear in the work of art. Art critic, it will be written on those subjects, materials and their phenomenal events representationally, how it will be reflected generally. The Interpretation in the music, to listen, how it will be dealt with the subjects of the piece whether the leitmotif will appear. It is up to the viewer's individual understanding ability, as well as listening, hearing, and seeing abilities.
"Work in progress" - Post New Art, after Neue Kunst:
I think that not only "New Music" in the 20th century, but rather "New art" is starting or will start in the 21st century. What is "New art"?, I mean, which is not from "Abdruck" of original from the 19th century, such as Central European philosophy of art in Europe. Which was so-called "High art and Low art" by Fascists in Europe as well as all over the world, but rather the new researches from the original in the study of archaeology, neuroscience, biology, antholoplogy, linguistics, and so on with other discipline(s) and/or without discipline in the study of art.
For example, in the painting, main study of art is with the Western painting techniques, such as painting brush as tool. However, within our knowledge in the 21st century, it is not enough for us, that is showed in medicine.
So, I study quantatum theory, such as in which general relativity, "events are continuous and deterministic, meaning that every cause matches up to a specific, local effect", for exploring visible and invisible spatiality, as well as in the topic of ageing.
What was "error(s)" of the Western arts?, it was the colonial strategies, however it's very complex.
How do we explore the artistic techniques with the new knowledge in the 21st century individually?, that is the research question as a starting point in the Joint Artistic Research, which is a characteristic property of the Joint Artistic Research for intermediary (intermediality).
Question for without idea of conjunction, it might be impossible to deal with the new knowledge. (It refers to the artistic research Variations.)