Abramovic's performance is a kind of act by Autor and Director, played a roll of an actress but in (her) political context of subjectivity towards common sense in the society. Thereby, I think that her point is about social contradictions, which was so-called "performativity". Abramovic had paid to a woman who changed the role with Abramovic, and played as a female artist.
How I see her performance from the aspect of organizational paradox, and on fictionality from her reality. For example, Abramovic bought a place from a woman where she is sitting mercuric in the picture like a film, in which place, who worked as prostitution professionally. And a woman in the art, who works in prostitution professionally, would present the reality of historical female life as a performer in the art world (ficutional world), such as "Weltanschauung/worldview is a finctional world also. It was an art work between film and theater (performance). So, realism in art or fiction in art, what tell (give us as an experience) us through art? which representation is the main attention, Abramovic as a prostitution professionally or a woman as an artist professionally?
You can create a parody that includes similar works, but you can't imitate her work.
In the eastern, communist countiries, the interpretation generally, Abramovic is the wise man who helped the poor woman (otherwise, it is impossible to present her work in the eastern countries, due to the control.). But she doesn't do anything, and in reality it's important for a woman who has a role as an artist professionally to make her own presentation. Finally, Abramovic gave the mythical image of a woman's reality for the audience. Twenty years after World War II, even during the period of high economic miracle, discrimination against women was still strong.