DPC Leiden University (The Hague, NL)
PD Kunst + Creatief (Utrecht, NL)
ELIA Mapping ethics https://www.researchcatalogue.net/view/699306/757848
All actors (humans, plants, viruses, objects, concepts) are connected to a number of other actors, and both human and non-human actors can have agency, i.e. they can interact in the networks of relations (...) It is not possible to choose or control all relations in a project, but it is possible to become sensitive to bias, to the conditions of choices and interactions, to understand how the relations in the research project are initiated and maintained, and to address the ethical dimensions of the interactions.
How does this particular relation influence my work, and vice versa?
What impact do I have on this specific relation?
Which relations are, or should be, out of my control?
Which relations do I need to accept?
What are the ethical implications of my answer to these questions
PD:
− accountability, respect and empowerment versus research as extractivism;
− transparency in aim and intent of research methods, but also openness to critical analysis of process and research methods;
− understanding consent of involved parties not only as individual consent, but also - and perhaps even more importantly - as community consent (which relies on matters like trust building rather than consent forms);
− understanding consent not as merely a formal waiver, but as free, prior, informed and renegotiable;
− (self-) awareness of bias and complicity in a research project;
− awareness of the fact that complex situations can have complex ethics;
− understand that ethics are not a matter of ticking boxes at the beginning of a research project, but are a process which essentially forms and re-forms during an entire project, including very early preparation and dissemination or "after care".
Tools:
Reserach Catalogue
Premiere Pro
VLC
Windows
DochDuckGo
Google Drive
Jitsi
Zoteo?
politics of referencing
science and techology
privacy
DELIMITATIONSx
POWER 1
SOURCES2
CONTEXTUALISATIONS3
