Aktuelle Duo-Arbeit von Lucien Castaing-Taylor habe ich nich nicht gelesen. Als ich sein kurzes Video mir angeschaut habe, habe ich mir gedacht auf das Sub-thema Madness und geistiger Zustand aus der Sicht von der Neurowissenschaft und Kognitiven Neurowissenschaft. Es trifft zu einem Thema 'Perspektive aus einem extremen physikalischen Zustand' als dokumental video ohne Subjekt.

Mein Interesse an seinem kurzen Video ist seine visuelle Logik auf der Ebene der Linguistik nachzudenken.


Zu seiner aktuellen Duo-Arbeit, erscheint es wichtig, dass Man sich mit  seinem/ihrem Thema und Sub-thema gesellscahftlich  auseinandersetzen, dabei denke ich mir nach, nicht ein extremer Fall als Tat von einer Verrückten Person und verrückte Person als nichts aus der Gesellschaft zu löschen. 

Der extreme Fall als Tat von den Verrückten Personen bestehen auf der Welt sehr viel und heute immer noch. Wie man sich damit auseinandersetzen könnte, das ist eine Frage als eine Künstlerin.


Wie er zum extremen herangeht, habe ich großen Respekt.

Ich bin Künstlerin, nicht Kunst-Historikerin, aus diesem Grund orientiert sich meine PhD Kunst-Forshung    auf Prinzip sowie Physik, Mathematik, Biologie, Linguistik, Äshtetik usw.

Add. from the perspective of artistic research

PhD Exposé-Entwurf

Preface / Vorwort:

 

Art as Ethics – Arti-fact is Not a Botschaft

 

Art might be in a dilemma between the digital world and being of art as Botschaft today, therefore the dilemma of contemporary society through art is the focus of my Ph.D. Kunst-Forschung, which is a contemplation (Reflexion) on the creativity of today's art thoughtfully. This follows Kant's idea in which he juxtaposes Phänomena and Ding an sich (transzendentales Selbstbewusstsein) in opposition. Kant predicates a perception itself (Wahrnehmung selbst) as phenomenon (Phänomen) that would be (spiritual) appearance / (geistige) Erscheinung through the unity of the experience (Erlebnis) or an event (Ereignis) in the abstract sense, which would become a purely intellectual realization. This sense of Kant's phenomenon (Phänomena) and thing-in-itself  (Ding an sich) in Zen-Buddhism is Satori (悟り), that the wisdom of knowledge as an intellectual conception (self-awareness) / intellektuelle Vorstellung (Selbstbewusstsein) through life in nature (geistige Anschauung), however, without the idea of transzendentale Objekt (transcendental object) in Zen-Buddhism. 

In the research, I contrast the idea of Satori (悟り) of Zen Buddhism and Kant's idea of Thing-in-itself as a debate philosophically, and I gradually explicate through the research process (exploration in practice and theory) methodically, for example, a logic of language in a Japanese poem (Waka 和歌"山のはにほのめくよひの月影に光もすくとぶ蛍かな (yamanohani honomekuyo(h)ino tsukikageni hikarimousuku tobuhotarukana)" – 題しらず (Ohne Titel) by Dogen-Zenji 道元禅師 as a starting point. An important research topic to explore is therefore "objectivity and subjectivity" as the aesthetics of existence between European and Asian cognition (Erkenntnis), particularly in contemporary cognition (Erkenntnis) from the perspective of neuroscience and cognitive neuroscience, which is in terms of the aesthetics of existence.

 

The Research Background and the Philosophy of Information:

Today's high technology tries as much as possible to develop for speedy and high quality system. In doing so, the scientists have been eminently exploring the best way of development in computer science together with systems engineering. However, these explorations are still transdisciplinary in computer science. My research position in this point of view is from the arts and humanities; how we can have "co-existence" with the technology in the current environment on Earth biologically. An important question here is what human creativity and its ability is.

For this question, in my artistic research on somatization of being in the philosophy of information, particularly the ontological problem which is explainable by means of simple formalism, is addressed in semi-formalism. This is an account of Nanay, so this question will be explored within the research method of the contemporary space strategy. Furthermore, it will be connected with today's society in the research social contextual subject, in which exploring is a (neo-) representational contemporary space strategy.

 

The Research Context, Research Question, and Objectives:

The research context consists of two fields of fine arts. One is visual logic – from twofoldness to threefoldness for multi-foldness in the visual arts – and the other is auditory perception 'seeing-in' in music. On that account, the important topics are an account of Bence Nanay's "semi-formalism" in his theses, which refer, for example, to the intention of the artist, the social context and some features of representation, and the "auditory and multi-sensory perception" approach in the theses of Casey O'Callaghan, who assumes forms of perception and awareness among senses beyond vision (auditory and multisensory perception). Thus I explore the basic concepts of human life that apply to the contemporary spatial strategy with respect to the philosophy of information in artistic research both in terms of aesthetics and critical theory. Therefore two research questions address the topic of objectivity and subjectivity that are for aesthetic experience in an environment. One is with regard to the research context and the second one is in respect of the objectives.

It seems in our life that there might be increased enthusiasm for the digital world, but at the same time it is a disenchantment of the world-reality. Nevertheless, the objectives in the research are for undermining creativity (Schöpfungskraft) and its cultural diversity, which consists of sustainable life from the biological aspect that wings hope. With regard to the objectives, two research questions add tension to the research.

 

The Research Method and Relevant Artists:

There are three main layers in the research method: i) Visual logic, ii) Auditory perception, iii) Contemporary space strategy – through the practical and theoretical exploring that is premised on theses in the research context. Each layer has artistic research on each topic in which there is a connection with the academic or scientific theories. Their research fields are aesthetics, philosophy, neuroscience, and evolutionary linguistics. Therefore also relevant artists are an important tension in the research, for instance their theme, leitmotif, and their subject. Furthermore, how they deal with them in their artwork (in medium and with material), which is philosophical and non-conventional.

 

The complete research focuses on the contemplation for ethics from the perspective of arts and humanities, namely on the subject of human creativity and its ability as a possibility of life through arts.

 


 

 

 

 1.  *道元禅師 Dogen Zenji (1200–1253), Eihei-ji (永平寺) / 曹洞宗 souto-shu, Author of 正法眼蔵 shobo genzo, the first contemplation on Japanese Zen-Buddhism in Japanese (和字 wa ji - 片仮名 Katakana and 平仮名 Hiragana) from Heian-Epoch, original Zen-Buddhism from China Bosatsu Daruma 菩薩達磨 (达摩, बोधिधर्मbodhidharma).

Research Method:  

Meta-Exposé: Schema Research Method -> 


There are three main layers in the research method: i) Visual logic, ii) Auditory perception, iii) Contemporary space strategy–through the practical and theoretical exploring that is premised on theses in the research context. Each layer has artistic research on each topic in which there is a connection with the academic and/or scientific theories. Their research fields are aesthetics, philosophy, neuroscience, and evolutionary linguistics. Therefore relevant artists are also an important tension in the artistic research, for instance their theme, leitmotif, and their subject. Furthermore, how they deal with them in their artwork (in medium and with material), which is philosophical and non-conventional.

In addition, I develop a new research method for my own creative logic in the research process.

noumenon in 2020 – Aesthetic Experience?

Abstract:

 

The core of my Ph.D. research in fine arts is the theme Körpermodernität and the subtheme is Unvollständigkeit since 2000 I 've been exploring. The latter is a semi-formal (semi-ausdrücklich) contemplation (Reflexion) on body and mind through arts, and its environment (time and space) in today's society. The leitmotif here is autonomy. The research topic is objectivity and subjectivity in two respects of neuroscience and cognitive neuroscience. The research question consists of two directions of creative perspective; a perspective in a direction from the outer world to the inner world, and in the second direction from the inner world to the outer world. Consequently practical and theoretical exploring for art theories with respect to the philosophy of information as well as evolutionary linguistics tend toward cultural evolution by the high technology of digital culture. The practical and theoretical exploring will proceed methodically in the research context, which is based on two artistic fields. The first of these is a research topic with regard to the research context on visual logics that explores contemporary semiotics and semantics in visual arts, and the second is on auditory perception 'seeing-in' that explores auditory Verständnis (appreciation) and its creativity in music. Furthermore, philosophy of perception as intercultural debate in the field of comparative philosophical issues of human life, termed "Ästhetik der Existenz" (Michel Foucault, in the European Philosophy) and "Ästhetik des Daseins" (Dogen-Zenji 道元禅師1, in the Japanese Zen-Buddhism) in their context of Western and Asian traditions, will address in a part of the research contemporary space strategy. Accordingly, its research outcome in this practice-based doctoral fine arts study focuses on "site-specific" art and installation practically.


Relevant Artists:   

Meta-Exposé: Schema Relevant Artists -> 


In addressing two research questions, I explore my own creative logic. In this regard, the approaches of relevant artists and their creative logic are an important tension in the research.

Some important points for the research are their theme and leitmotif, and their subject; furthermore, how they deal with them in their artwork (in medium and with material), philosophical and non-conventional.

I started to research two fields of fine arts on John Cage in music and Marcel Duchamp in visual arts.

On their philosophy of art from four aspects:

- In their approach from the aspect of anthropology and of mythology.

- Paradigm shift or Renaissance-dispositive (dispositif)?

- Ästhetik des Daseins

- Ästhetik der Existenz

 

Relevance Innovation: Meta-Exposé: Schema  Relevance Innovation -> 

 

The innovation is based on academic artistic research, but also in a manner of a minority aspect, e.g. from an aspect of blindness in the practical and theoretical exploring.

It consists of three institutional foundations that are art institution, culture institution, and art education, and simultaneously for prospective dynamism in the art world, for instance a new art movement by artist collectives, cross-disciplinary art projects and so on, with regard to the exploring of (neo-) presentational space in the research.

 


 

Objectives:   

Meta Exposé: Schema Objectives ->


Most important in the objectives: In addressing two research questions, I explore my own creative logic (own account) in regards to the research context, that is the exploring of the meta-physics on life-being (Wesen) in today's society (in regards to the social context). Consequently I explore my own creative logic in the subject of probability in a life (body in a space) and its possibility of time explicitly, where ƒ is the research question, whose explorations are for profound ideas and their knowledge, and artistic intention. In doing so, I conceptualize artistic research in a manner of a minority aspect, e.g. from an aspect of blindness in the practical and theoretical exploring. 

Therefore the objectives consist of three institutional ideas that are art institution, culture institution, and art education, and simultaneously for prospective dynamism in the art world, for instance a new art movement by artist collectives, cross-disciplinary art projects and so on, with regard to the exploring of (neo-) presentational space in the research. My approach in this Ph.D. artistic research is concerned with the anthropological perspective of idea and with cultural evolution (cultural diversity).

 

References: References ->

Timeline : Timeline (draft) ->

Research Question:   

Meta-Exposé: Schema Preface / Vorwort_Model ->

 


Two forms of research question for something in what – time, space, and body.

 

According to Aristotle, “nature is an inner principle of change and being at rest” (Physics 2.1, 192b20–23).

 

 - What is pleasure for us, which is an important element x in our life?

 

If things (Dinge) are ugly, or moreover, if something wriggles in things, is it something in what?

 

The research question "What is pleasure for us which is important element x in our life?" is in regard to the research context, in the first instance to Kant's idea of noumenon. Therefore I explore this research question practically and theoretically, which means exploring "What is Aesthetic Experience in Today's Society?" and " What is Art in Today's Society For?"

The second question "If things (Dinge) are ugly, or moreover, if something wriggles in things, is it something in what?" is in respect of the objectives.

 

 

 

Research Context:  

Meta Exposé: Schema Research Context ->

                       Schema Research Context_Model -> 

 

 

題しらず (Ohne Titel)

 

山のはにほのめくよひの月影に光もうすくとぶ蛍かな

 

(yamanohani honomekuyo(h)ino tsukikageni hikarimousuku tobuhotarukana)

 

– A Japanese Poem (Waka/和歌: Tanka/短歌) by Dōgen Zenji/ 道元禅師

 

This Tanka (Japanese poem) is a quote in a paper on Aesthetic of Existence and Ästhetik des Daseins, which I’m writing in an artistic research of “Reflection on the auditory and visual aspects of site-specific in arts“. In terms of this Tanka, it refers to the research context, i.e. the aesthetics of perception as philosophy. Therefore the creative (pictorial / bildnerisch) logic of language and auditory consciousness in this Tanka, which makes sense for the logic of thought, is an expression of time perception (Zeitwahrnehmung) and its space through creative logic. In this way, this Tanka expresses something about "life"-being (Wesen). It is an ethic that is essential and phenomenological in its own foundation (body and mind). 

Ästhetik der Existenz“ by Michel Foucault (in terms of mythology) and Ästhetik des Daseins“ from Asian aesthetics (in relation to Dogen's idea of 达摩, बोधिधर्म, bodhidharma) in the research context of the two cultures (Asia-Europe) as (intercultural) debate are a part of the important context in the research. Entity (Wesen) in the research context is concerned with the probability in life (body and space) and their possibility of time. Therefore its outcome is something. Something in life is being always, it is a life, there is probability like X in life (body and space) and Y is its possibility of time. In the research, ƒ is in a research question in which the objectives are respected.

 

The research context consists of two fields of fine arts, namely visual arts and music, provided that the research is premised on the following theses.

 

- Aesthetics as Philosophy of Perception, Bence Nanay (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016) from the aspect of visual perception, in the files of visual art, aesthetics and philosophy (of art) which relate to neuroscience. I explore an account of „Semi-Formalism” of Nanay in his theses and which is a context of my artistic research that refers to, for example, the intention of the artist, the social context, and some representational features.

- Beyond Vision, Casey O’Callaghan (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017) from the aspect of auditory perception in the multisensory philosophical approach, in the field of sonic art, aesthetics, and philosophy (of art) that relate to neuroscience. I explore the subject “auditory and multisensory perception” in his approach of which takes the forms of perception and awareness among senses beyond vison in his theses, and thereby I deal also with his theses in process of developing my account of ästhetisches Dasein.

   And besides, I explore the subject on sematicization of Being in the Philosophy of Information practiacally, in which chapter "Philosophy of artificail intelligence as a premature paradigm of PI" (Luciano Floridi, The Philosophy of Information, New York: OUP, 2011) with regard to the research „contemporary space strategy“.

 

 


                     

-> PhD Kunst-Forshung in Fine Arts on Auditory

- Soundscape (sinngemäßige Klanglandschaft)

- Sound Ecology

This question is in a  research background, which in terms of noumenon in the Philosophy of Information. For PhD Research doctor phil. it is my self-obligation that is a rethinking process on noumenon in the Philosophy of Information.

To explicate this Tanka (Japanese old short Poem), I need for that extra page.

Old Japanese is incompletely form, and the expression of space and its time perception in a logic of words that meaning is diversity. It consists in a composition of Tanka 5 7 5 7 7. This poem (Tanka 短歌) is like a painting of Magritte (without subject). Thereby my interpretation is on life. Surrialism such as painting of Magritte (Magritte's picture ("La condition humaine")) without subject is not about own psychology or it's not psychological, but rather it's about geistig resistance. Magritte's La condition humanie is more conceptual (painting) and Dogen's ohne titel has one more thing of an another world. Dogen hat mindestens 96 Bände von seiner Forschung veröffentlicht. Ich bin kritisch gegenüber Heidegger's auf Dogen. In diesem Sinne Gemälde von Pollock trifft nicht zum Japanischen Minimalismus.

If I explore on perception, it means that also on Surrealism, but my research itself is not about Surrealism. 

-> PhD Kunst-Forshung in Fine Arts on Visual

- Limited of self-knowledge, how artists know/knew by themself. What is knowing oneself?

- Theme, Subtheme, Leitmotif, its context or their social context as background

- Intuition

 

- An extract of a performance of Whirled Music in this film about Max Eastley

 

 

Darstellungsform (art or writing) to understand or to interrelate psychological, it's special of academic in Germany, in particular by old generation in the arts. But Surrealism is not psychological. 

-> PhD Kunst-Forschung of the explorement "What is 'knowledge' in Arts?" - Emotional Intelligence parctically.

I think that the machine leaning is not so imporatnt for brain.

On what do I research from the aspect of Art?

 

I research re-thinking of art from the aspect of contemporary science and academic together, such as within the relevante Artists. Artists in general were Geisteswissenschafter (Humanity and Arts) with their practical notion and intuition. In my research, I need the artworks in this line. If I can deal with the notion and intuition of relevante artistis of my research, after then I can manage the artwork and artist such as artist with autism or with other social minority from the aspect of same stance that is artistc research in practical notion and intution. For this purpose, the critic on artwork is a research perspective of Aesthetics and Philosophy of art.

 

For what do I research?

For re-thinking on art from the aspect of contemporary science and academic in the position of art (Humanity and Arts).

 

A relevante Artist Lucien Castaing-Taylor in my artistic research who is an anthropologist. My interest in his work for the linguistic sense through human consciousness. His artistic medium is time-based audiovisual. It concerns me in the topic of multimodality.

A short video by Lucien Castaing-Taylor on the same level of consciousness of which in a Poem "Ohne Titel" by Dogen that consists in the linguistics by human consciousness. Even who has no notion on the linguistic level, one can feel through his/their works. But who has the notion of the linguistics of human consciousness, his work makes another path in human consciousness. In my artistic research its Darstellung is as ƒ and I call it 'third space' in Art.

For example Vorstellung through a Poem "Ohne Titel" by Dogen, it's up to person (recipient). There is no fixed vision and no any represented visions in this poem that is phenomenological and it makes sense to open for the next moment. How we call "to make sense" usually in the art, that is such as 'inspire', 'inspirational', and so on, but it is not ƒ and which I call 'third space' in Art.

If person (recipient) want to understand both works as Information, it works also. Without subject means no psychological expression, and  Castaing-Taylor's short video is in contrast to a Poem by Dogen.

For this reason, computer generated art is might be new visual vision, but it is not enough for us Human consciousness in the linguistics. We need physical 'realtiy' for that which is not artificial. Verb is a very important 'Function' of  through physical experience in the linguistics. Interpretation itself consists with human experience. Machine has no Interpretation by experience, AI makes analysis through informations. For Human, what is important that is profound knowledge, by contrast with AI that needs diverse informations.


Kant ist ein Philosoph, Dogen ist ein Zen-Buddhist-Mönch und Ästhetiker (He is an Essentialist from european philosophical appreciation.). Die Kontemplation von Dogen ist eine Philosophie, stammt von der Kontemplation (Philosophie) original  बोधिधर्मbodhidharma.


 

 

The Schema of Objectives is for the research question that is a very important in the research (Kunst-Forschung), particulary for theses of Arts.

However, I don't want to regards with the context of „ecology of the brain“ (Fuchs, Thomas, OUP, 2018, original „Das Gehirn - ein Beziehungsorgan“, W. Kohlhammer, 2007) directly, due to his context is medicine generally. I have to explicate on Subjectivitiy and Objectivity in my research context, and Fuchs's these is one of important theses from the perspective of Neuroscience in the research (Kunst-Forschung).

In the contemporary society, if one would close own world (mind), then it would be rigidly, e.g. no Idea for.

 

 

A kind of Darstellung of Japanese Minimalism, which is not a minimal form of continuous. A understanding of Japanese Minimalism in Germany or in Europe is minimal form of continuous.

Origninal is 'will being of nichts' that is mathematical logic of consciousness (semantics and semiotics), so that outcome is simple. It is important how it will be simple with a logic, that is an aeshtetic. Thereby how to wirte a reception by a recipient, it's a creation also. 

A reception is not an opinion, it must also a perception.

It was a kind of emotional intelligence in Old Japanese Life.

 

My art style is not any more original Formalism, rather it is multimodality and my own, because of mediums, languages and so on, and my art is not Japanese Minimalism like Dogen. For that I have to explore and to write more than 300-400 Papers. It means that I've been exploring in artistic research until my death. 

I'm an artist (Künstlerin), PhD Artistic research for and as an Artist is 'intuition' that is an important in the Research Method. A result through intution is one of important resaerch outcome. Each artist has own Research method, I have my own research method also. I try to explore more systematic and develope a research method for new subject as well as three layers research method. In doing so, the aspect of Neuroscience and Cognitive neuroscience are important to deal. I'm sceptic for general understanding and appreciation about EI (emotional Intelligence). Writing on Intuition, there are enough researches in Neuroscience, Psychology, and also in Philosophy. As Research subject it is not special.

Surrealism is not my recherch context, but, it roots Renaissance. (->)

In the case of Japanese it were Dogen in the linguistics of human consciousness. (->)

The History of Psychology is not old, and it's a very complicate study field. This study field is required re-thinking today. The History of Neuroscience in the World-Cultures is older than Psychology.

- Ich explore "Bewusstsein" in Philosophy and in Neuroscience from the aspect of Japan (Asia) and Europe.

Reseach method is, on the thesen of Fuck's through artworks by some of relevant artisits, but from the aspect of art (Philosophy of art and Art science).

- in doing so, I explore "Visual logic".

- at the same time I explore "Auditory perception – seeing-in".

- then on "multisensory interaction and multimodality" in the evolutionary linguistics which relates to my reseach question. 

 

My research is on modernising of Art science and Philosophy of art, it's required parctical exploring. My academic research field is Fine arts and Aesthetics.

Contemporary Aesthetics relates to Neuroscience and Cognitive neuroscience, as well as Evolutionary linguistics.

I'm a fine artist and an artistic researcher in the field of Fine arts and Aesthetics practically and theoretically.

-> PhD Kunst-Forshung in Fine Arts on Auditory

- Soundscape (sinngemäßige Klanglandschaft), ich herangehe 'dispositif'.

- Sound Ecology

-> PhD Kunst-Forshung in Fine Arts on Visual

In the theoretical exploring: In my Research context of Theses by two academicians, I'm really thankful, also for the Philosophy of information, that I thank for re-thinking of arts in the aesthetics. 

However, I have many questions towards the theses by scientist and academician in the practical exploring (artistic research) through my life experience, particularly in arts.

 

Why  artistic research is important?

- Art is human activity and bilological, we can never comprised in a closely world. 

The artistic research is necessary in humanities and arts.

 

My PhD Kunst-Forschung is in Fine Arts.

I explore the human notion in arts on the cognitive level theoretically and parctically. Therefore the relevante artists are important in the research.

Marcel Duchamp, my interest in his artwork is in regard to an artistic research ->

 

-> PhD Kunst-Forshung

Cognitive neuroscience and Aesthetics

I'm writing on objectivity and subjectivity through my experience of contemporary medical thesen, and try to write on the level of PhD from the percpective of aesthetics, however, I can better to create it by my art logic.

There is no class differences society any more today, and the high culture and high art don't exist any more in the law. The history of avant-garde is since long time, even avant-garde hisotry (in particular, in the history of literature) in Japan is very long too, it is not only in Europe. To write on avant-garde hisotry, it needs for few pages.

My artwork on a website of LensCulture: I've received a short review on my artworks (series „An intermediate“) that was just a perception of series „an intermediate“ (written by an associate of LensCulture) who was anonymous, and I found it was a nice that was written in English by anonymous (no Gender, no Nationality, no Gentic Information such as ethnic, sex and age, no CV (no Information of Study and no Infromation of Profession) and no Name). This short review was ehrlich that was a just perception from the perspective of Erkenntnis Theorie through feeling of someone. So that I keep just this series on the Webiste of LensCulture, even I don't apply for the Photo Award, I have really no time to consider for another things currently. I have to explore precisely.

On this website there is an image a person ‘I' who has artifical blond wig. This image is self-protrait that I represented (darstellt) mich selbst, that is a refelction on the subject of Genome editing. Therefore who interpreted artifical blond wig as symbolic or own wishing that were rarely today. My attempt in this self-protrait series "Ich trage mich selbst" with artifical wigs is "seltsam". On genome editing, we can never know whole of life, so that this series is something. After the accident by implant OP, I have to think about the treatment in which way, if my DNA were destroyed or if I had an error in my DNA. I had seltsam time at the Hospitals (between) in Japan and in Germany. It was my first expreience to understand my situation (what mean 'body' in a situation, its being. My body in DNA to understand.), thereby I could understand what is 'disease' in the contemporay medicine. As a patient, I had pain, I couldn't walk, I couldn't use my arm day by day. My DNA was ok (in Ordnung), I had not chronic Illness and the result by doctors was self-repairable DNA. In doing so, I understand and study the neuroscience, how brain works, how to use my brain ecologically, thus brain was the most important organ in this case (treatment), due to autonomical function of my body that is subconsciously via multisensory.

The brain controls subconsciously via multisensory, what I needed for that was 'good sleep'. If I'm 'Bewusst'  and have correct Information, then brain works much better than unknown. Therefore autonomy is important. Body (molecular mechanism) is very intelligence. In Japan (I think that it is same level of exploring in North America and Europe also.) there is themedical exploring for pain in the contemporaray neuroscience. My understanding is in 'sleep', but What is 'sleep' in the neuroscience?, it is a big subject in the exploring. Therefore my PhD Kunst-Forschung of the explorement "What is 'knowledge' in Arts?" - Emotional Intelligence, step by step as artist to me it is sure in my life practically .


Video: Aneuploidy - Cell division slipped out of gear 

-> This video itself give me as an idea of function and character of cell, but I don't believe as medicine. I've been reading since a couple of year the papers of the neuroscience (medicine), the reality is not like the video. However, this video as information useful as material in mind.

I read the papers of the medicine in English, also in German, I had to understand the diagnosis in German, Medicin in German to understand, that is very difficult more than in English.

Why I read the papers of the neuroscience (medicine), because I need to understand for, what is the neuroceince in the contemporary medicine? My Gehirn MRT Untersuchung at the Unversity clinic was very good, no injury and no defect - well.

Society system would be developed more through human being of ->

On culture idenitiy today, it seems on personal level today, that is not any more on the national level, so called individual.

Due to social Milieu, schließt sie in sich nicht ein.

PhD in Art is same as in other acdemics, that is the specialization in art.

Art as study is very wide study area.

->Dear Erika,

Thank you so much for sharing your work with me. (...)

 

(...) What brings the images together is a strong sense of abstraction and the ability for each to both invite the viewer in, while maintaining the mystery, loaded with unresolved issues.

Your number 1 has a deep historical and personal context for you. Even without reading your statement that accompanies the image, I sense division. There is our side for the viewer and the unobserved side...we just cannot see through it. We see promise there, but little detail. There is promise in the flowers and danger in the waters. Men stand guard as they look over the scene.

In number 2, we see a similar relationship, only in the self. But since the face and identifty are obscured, it's easy to identify with the subject. There is complexity here again and we wonder who they are and then, who we are. The studio like setting creates an object on display or to be studied.

Number 3 and 4 are from different series, but they possess similar properties. I am most taken with their space and how easy or repelling it might be to get closer. They are details, part of a larger experience.

For number 5...unfortuantely, it did not load properly on my screen, so I just have a thumbnail. From what I see, it is also a nice attachment to the two previous ones. A feeling of attraction, curiosity, and tentativeness. (...)

(Excerpt of a short review by LensCulture)

 

I have original of all works (Prints) in my workshop (Arbeitszimmer), and I know that physical works have another representational worth. I know it form the message of who visited my workshop and watched orignial directly. 

so that, I do not motivate much for a presentation on Website generally, however this comment by LensCulture was nice. 

-> Perception (Audio and Visual)

    Threefoldness

    'Site-Specific'

I need to have large inner-space (in mind) like Objectives in Today's informational society, at the same time, it is an artistic geistig resistance towards the subject of objectivitiy and subjectivity.

twofoldness is too small space in mind for an informational society, like ->

The Schema of Objectives is for the research question that is a very important in the research (Kunst-Forschung), particulary for theses of Arts.

However, I don't want to regards with the context of „ecology of the brain“ (Fuchs, Thomas, OUP, 2018, original „Das Gehirn - ein Beziehungsorgan“, W. Kohlhammer, 2007) directly, due to his context is medicine generally. I have to explicate on subjectivitiy and objectivity in my research context, and Fuchs's these is one of important theses from the perspective of Neuroscience in the research (Kunst-Forschung).

Unvollständigkeit

Semi-Formalism

- Multimodality