Bart van Oort

Netherlands (residence) °1959
en

Bart van Oort studied piano and fortepiano at the Royal Conservatory in The Hague. In 1986 he won the first prize and the Audience prize at the Mozart Fortepiano Competition in Brugges, Belgium. He subsequently studied with Malcolm Bilson at Cornell University (Ithaca, NY), receiving a Doctor of Musical Arts degree in Historical Performance Practice in 1993.

Bart van Oort has given lectures and masterclasses and performed all over the world. He teaches fortepiano and is a lecturer in Historical Performance Practice at the Royal Conservatory in The Hague. Since 1997 Van Oort has made more than fifty recordings of chamber music and solo repertory. 

comments

Exposition: Stanislavski on singing, the tools we can use to help us stay better focused on Stage (14/09/2023) by Juncai Zhang
Bart van Oort 28/02/2024 at 09:47

research approved


Exposition: Historical Clarinet Mouthpieces: An Analysis and Re-creation studyHistorical Clarinet Mouthpieces: An Analysis and 3D Re-creation study (21/02/2023) by Sergio Sánchez Martín
Bart van Oort 23/02/2023 at 00:33

Approved 22 March 2023

Bart van Oort


Exposition: Man's struggle for salvation: A programmatic interpretation of Franz Liszt's B minor Sonata (16/11/2022) by Leone Monaco
Bart van Oort 20/02/2023 at 21:22

Approved on February 20, 2023

Bart van Oort, supervisor


Exposition: LEADING FROM THE HARPSICHORD: A HISTORICAL INFORMED APPROACH TO EARLY MUSIC 'CONDUCTING' (15/11/2022) by Pablo Devigo
Bart van Oort 20/02/2023 at 21:21

Approved on February 20, 2023

Bart van Oort, supervisor


Exposition: The evolution between the Toccatas in “Toccate e Partite I (1615)” and “Toccate e Partite II (1627)” by G. Frescobaldi (22/02/2022) by Seung Gyun Yu
Bart van Oort 28/02/2022 at 21:56

Research approved

Bart van Oort

Supervisor


Exposition: Rediscover the Structure of Goldberg Variations (09/01/2021) by Shengqi Chen 
Bart van Oort 24/02/2022 at 23:57

approved

 


Exposition: Rediscover the Structure of Goldberg Variations (09/01/2021) by Shengqi Chen 
Bart van Oort 21/02/2022 at 20:11

NOT YET approved: what needs to be done will take quite some time

still missing:

- sound examples demonstrating what one or the other structure means for performance

- scores illustrating which variations are crucial for certain of the possible views on the structure (readers do not have them memorized)

- conclusions should not only list the methodology and list the various possible views on the structure, but also evaluate them. Which one is most successful, even if only subjectively. This should be accompanied by a demonstration of why it the structure of choice is more (or othes less) successful.