The topic of atmosphere is particularly interesting especially since the reader is not immune to its influence even when engaging this piece of artistic research. Representing space and place through the intersections of photography and architecture, Goodwin examines the topic in a critical and reflective manner.
The interviews presented are especially thought provoking. While the vision of the artist or architect would appear prominent, the collected responses suggest openness to collaboration in how space is represented in our memory. However, questions still remain whether the photograph serves as documentation or more of a persuasive tool. A debate that seems consistent with photography in general.
The outcome re: a hinged knowledge block is helpful for bringing the diverse items discussed together. The recorded interviews are also an excellent resource for folks who want to dig into the particulars of each interviewee.
I am particular impressed with the Goodwin’s ability to define the terms and to build a very interesting argument and conclusion. There is great innovation in the context of the interview study combined with practice- based research. It certainly provides new insights and knowledge from the great data collected. The exchange between photographers and architects only serves to build a knowledge base that can be expanded. The feedback is important and the diagrams illustrate this increased understanding.
The design of the article is quite nice and supports the exposition. The materials and methods section is helpful in this area for the rich use of imagery. Goodwin’s enthusiasm and knowledge of the topic really shines in his discussion and his research turned advocacy of photography is motivating.
The topic of atmosphere is particularly interesting especially since the reader is not immune to its influence even when engaging this piece of artistic research. Representing space and place through the intersections of photography and architecture, Goodwin examines the topic in a critical and reflective manner.
The interviews presented are especially thought provoking. While the vision of the artist or architect would appear prominent, the collected responses suggest openness to collaboration in how space is represented in our memory. However, questions still remain whether the photograph serves as documentation or more of a persuasive tool. A debate that seems consistent with photography in general.
The outcome re: a hinged knowledge block is helpful for bringing the diverse items discussed together. The recorded interviews are also an excellent resource for folks who want to dig into the particulars of each interviewee.
I am particular impressed with the Goodwin’s ability to define the terms and to build a very interesting argument and conclusion. There is great innovation in the context of the interview study combined with practice- based research. It certainly provides new insights and knowledge from the great data collected. The exchange between photographers and architects only serves to build a knowledge base that can be expanded. The feedback is important and the diagrams illustrate this increased understanding.
The design of the article is quite nice and supports the exposition. The materials and methods section is helpful in this area for the rich use of imagery. Goodwin’s enthusiasm and knowledge of the topic really shines in his discussion and his research turned advocacy of photography is motivating.