Dispositions of Being-With: Redistributing Heterogeneity among the Concert Audience

Kelvin King Fung Ng

The concert setting, as standardised through the worldwide prevalence of Western Classical music, offers a unique condition in which audience members from various backgrounds coexist in the same time and space, and are prompted to act and interact, restrictedly yet often intensely, by attending and orienting themselves to a medium frequently marked by its intangibility and ineffability. Despite such a richly layered social practice, existing musical works that aim to bring about divergent models of communion tend to eschew this listening convention, rather than harnessing the aforementioned characteristics to unleash new forms of togetherness. My artistic research seeks to instigate such novel social configurations by creating musical works that articulate previously unexposed relationships among concert audience members. Through factoring in their differing preconditions relative to the performance, my works aim to redistribute what can be sensed by whom (Rancière 2004). Grounded in a pragmatist view of music-listener co-articulation, I introduce the concepts of circumscribed and preferred affordances. Their dynamics at work are examined through pieces that resonate with my approach, including und als wir (1993) by Mathias Spahlinger and Quadraturen V (2000) by Peter Ablinger. These help illuminate my strategies in redistributing the sensible while motivating intersubjective awareness, as exemplified in D!V£R#!M&NT! (2024) and Brief Version of Seoljanggu (2021–), which configure heterogeneous sets of affordances in relation to individual and cultural differences. Knowledge and experiences generated through this endeavour aim to deepen our understanding of the intricate intersubjectivities of listening, while also opening new routes for broader reflections on the social dimensions of human relations.

Ablinger, Peter. 2006. “Peter Ablinger – Quadraturen.” Accessed August 31, 2025. https://ablinger.mur.at/docu11.html.
Ablinger, Peter. 2020. “Inverted Perspective.” Accessed August 31, 2025. https://ablinger.mur.at/txt_inverted-perspective.html
Ablinger, Peter. 2024. “English texts.” Accessed August 31, 2025. https://ablinger.mur.at/engl.html
Adorno, Theodor W. 1997. Aesthetic Theory. Edited by Gretel Adorno and Rolf Tiedemann. Translated by Robert Hullot-Kentor. London: The Athlone Press.
Born, Georgina. 2017. “After Relational Aesthetics: Improvised Music, the Social, and (Re)Theorizing the Aesthetic.” In Improvisation and Social Aesthetics, edited by Georgina Born, Eric Lewis, and Will Straw. Durham: Duke University Press. doi: 10.1515/9780822374015.
Brandt, Per Aage. 2004. Spaces, Domains, and Meaning. Bern: Peter Lang.
Cachopo, João Pedro, Patrick Nickleson, and Chris Stover, eds. Rancière and Music. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2020.
Clarke, Eric. 2005. Ways of Listening: An Ecological Approach to the Perception of Musical Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DeNora, Tia. 2003. After Adorno: Rethinking Music Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eco, Umberto. 1979. The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Fetterman, William. 1996. John Cage's Theatre Pieces: Notations and Performances. New York: Routledge.
Heidegger, Martin. 1962. Being and Time. Translated by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Johnston, Sheila. 1985. “Film Narrative and the Structuralist Controversy.” In The Cinema Book, edited by Pam Cook. London: British Film Institute.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Meyer, Leonard B. 1956. Emotion and Meaning in Music. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
MusicWeb International. 2001. “The Contemporary Music Scene in Germany (2000) John Warnaby.” Accessed August 31, 2025. https://www.musicweb-international.com/sandh/2001/Feb01/germany.htm
Nancy, Jean-Luc. 2000. Being Singular Plural. Translated by Robert D. Richardson and Anne E. O'Byrne. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Oakley, Todd. 2009. From Attention to Meaning: Explorations in Semiotics, Linguistics, and Rhetoric. Bern: Peter Lang.
Pecher, Diane, René Zeelenberg and Lawrence W Barsalou. 2003. “Verifying different-modality properties for concepts produces switching costs.” In Psychological Science 14, (2): 119–124. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.t01-1-01429.
Rancière, Jacques. 2004. The Politics of Aesthetics: The Distribution of the Sensible. Translated by Gabriel Rockhill. London: Continuum.
Rancière, Jacques. 2010. Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics. Translated by Steve Corcoran. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Reybrouck, Mark. 2017. “Music and Semiotics: An Experiential Approach to Musical Sense-Making.” In Interdisciplinary Approaches to Semiotics, edited by Asunción López-Varela Azcárate. IntechOpen. doi: 10.5772/67860.
Robinson, Dylan. 2020. Hungry Listening: Resonant Theory for Indigenous Sound Studies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Smith, Neil T. 2023. Mathias Spahlinger. Edited by Martin Iddon. Critical Guides to Contemporary Composers. Bristol: Intellect Books.
Spahlinger, Mathias. 1993. Und als wir. Universal Edition.
Spahlinger, Mathias. 2015. “Political Implications of the Material of New Music.” Contemporary Music Review 34, (2-3): 127–166. doi: 10.1080/07494467.2015.1094212.

Tip

Tip

Kelvin King Fung Ng - Dispositions of Being-With: Redistributing Heterogeneity among the Concert Audience - 2025

7. References