Luis Berríos-Negrón

Germany, Puerto Rico (residence), Puerto Rico (citizenship) °1971
research interests: Global Warming, colonial memory, environmental art
affiliation: NONE
en

I explore the forces of environmental form. I call these practise-based explorations 'social pedestals'. Recent exhibits include “Neganthropic Anarchive” at Gammelgaard (DK, 2019), “Wardian Table” in Agropoetics at Savvy Berlin (DE, 2019), “Impasse Finesse Neverness” Museum of Archeology of Bahia (BRA, 2017), “Collapsed Greenhouse” at District Berlin (DE, 2016), and “Earthscore Specularium” at Färgfabriken (SE, 2015). I was commissioned artist at the 3rd Biennial of Art of Bahia (2014), represented Germany in the 10th São Paulo Biennial of Architecture (2013), was core-collaborator with Paul Ryan for his “Threeing” project at Documenta13, and was exhibited in Ute Meta Bauer’s “Future Archive” at the Neuer Berliner Kunstverein (2012). I founded the Anxious Prop art collective, the Paramodular environmental design group, the Transhemispheric Residency* Programme, and am associate member of the M.I.T. Council for the Arts. My Bachelor of Fine Arts is from Parsons New School (2003), have a Master of Architecture from M.I.T. (2006), and recently defended my PhD for the Art Technology Design joint programme between Konstfack University of the Arts and the Royal Institute of Technology of Sweden (KTH, 2015-20).


research

research expositions

  • open exposition comments (0)

comments

Exposition: IN SITU: Sonic Greenhouse. Composing for the intersections between the sonic and the built (13/01/2018) by Otso Tapio Lähdeoja et al.
Luis Berríos-Negrón 24/03/2019 at 14:59

Comment about 'In Situ'

From a disciplinary and collaborative standpoint, the exposition presents a high level of excellence manifested by its technological output.

Specifically intervening in a greenhouse facility is of relevance. Beyond its role as contribution to research in sound art, it also compliments broadly to environmental art, installation, art display, curatorial practices, architecture, climate studies, history of science and technology, and sustainable architectural practice.

I am concern though that a critical analysis of ‘greenhouse’, itself as ‘medium’, is missing. It is a traditional, 19th century approach to celebrating greenhouse, falling short of addressing contemporary assessments of what this important technology, building, gas, effect, and spatial display, of natural history, and of art, represents today within the toxic logic of global warming.

I do want to absolutely point to the very thoughtful, if elegant aspirations to identify, and even privilege aural over visual experience.

But, in the context of perceptual and environmental studies, by omitting the overarching importance of ‘greenhouse’ in relation to the pervasive invisibility of global warming, the work unfortunately celebrates a still-colonial attitude towards perceptual problems, particularly the ones 'greenhouse' has represented for over 200 years.

As far as its research quality, this is a difficult aspect to evaluate. Is the work produced to create a series of specific aural outcomes in the way an artist traditionally preconceives and deploys the artwork, in this case the ephemera of instruments and triggers created to activate the space and produce a previously unknown aural experience, just as an abstract expressionist drip painter, or a performance artist or musician improvises to deliver a previously unknown outcome? Or was the work produced as a method to question and explore sensorial experiences in ways that would quantifiably and/or qualitatively inform and enrich the practice of sound art, installation, display, etc.?

I suppose these are the questions I would propose to both the authors and their 'readers'.

But, those questions ought not impede the thrust of the work, as I do strongly believe that In Situ merits due attention for the robust commitment and complexity it portrays.