Exposition

Objects that Matter - Performance Art and Objects (2019)

Pilvi Porkola

About this exposition

The Study on Objects (2018-) is an ongoing art project that focuses on everyday life objects we are surrounded by. While considering the objects and working with videos, I contemplate the relationship between new materialism and performance art. Feminist new materialism offers a perspective to explore many performance art works that reveal how we are related to objects and how we deal with them.
typeresearch exposition
keywordsperformance art, object, New Materialism, feminism, everyday life
date01/10/2018
published23/05/2019
last modified23/05/2019
statuspublished
share statusprivate
licenseAll rights reserved
urlhttps://www.researchcatalogue.net/view/513141/513142
doihttps://doi.org/10.22501/ruu.513141
published inRUUKKU - Studies in Artistic Research
portal issue11.


Simple Media

id name copyright license
513206 objects_balloon2018 pporkola All rights reserved
513228 kampa1 pporkola All rights reserved
513230 kivi1 pporkola All rights reserved
513232 leopardi1 pporkola All rights reserved
513234 muki1 pporkola All rights reserved
514180 objects_stone pporkola All rights reserved
514189 Näyttökuva (2) pporkola All rights reserved
514418 objects_book pporkola All rights reserved
595593 objects_balloon2 pp All rights reserved
595602 objects_balloon2 pp All rights reserved
595609 objects_book2 pp All rights reserved
595616 objects_kivi2 pp All rights reserved
595620 objects_balloon2 pp All rights reserved

RUUKKU portal comments: 2
Mark Leahy 21/05/2019 at 12:38

The following peer review was presented to the author during the process and have influenced the final exposition. It is here presented in a slightly edited form.

 

Mark Leahy:

 

The exposition fits the call for proposals and contributions very well; it engages with questions of new materialism, feminism, performance art, and relations to and engagement with objects.

 

Structurally the exposition outlines a critical / theoretical context; then reviews some particular examples of practice, both older and more recent, that are usefully viewed within that context, and then presents a sequence or series of investigations, experiments, or essays of the author's practice.

 

These are presented in video form through the exposition, initially without any comment, then are briefly discussed in the closing sections of the text.

 

The examples of historical and recent performance art chosen are appropriate and relate well to the more recent examples, and to the author’s work.

 

The critical texts cited, Tillman, Bolt and Alaimo, allow the author to quickly outline a context of new materialist thought and the ‘material turn’ as well as offering specific links to the practices discussed by presenting a nuanced account of objects in relation to matter and agency that is inflected with a feminist understanding, and an awareness of art practices.

 

The clear and simple form of the videos is very effective within the online context of the research catalogue and uses the potential of this mode of presenting research very well.

 

The exposition engages with questions of repetition, both the repetitive possibility of the embedded videos, the sense of everyday actions as repeated, and the repetition of generic or inherited forms or actions within the ongoing history of performance art. The chosen performance actions function as examples of practice and as evidence of the investigation undertaken by the author; they have tested particular engagements with things, with materials, and presented these directly to the reader / viewer apparently in an unmediated style. In the three videos the performer engages with things that have specific and different qualities, different responses or ways of being themselves, and different ways in which they are understood or apprehended by human users. The dictionary in its behaviour as a thing, with weight and mass, is different from the cultural weight the author is under when she balances it on her head; the obduracy of the piece of rock, its condition of 'just being' is very different from the 'exchange' that happens with the balloon.

 

Fabulation is engaged with through the sense of these being recognisable objects, familiar socially and culturally, that we may already have relationships with, may already have used as the artists do. I feel that there is room to expand on the three video performances within the scope and scale of the exposition, and to draw out more of the discoveries that are being made within the investigative process.

 

I think that the presentation of artistic practice is clear but there is room to develop the exposition in terms of artistic research. If the research context is more developed then the reception of the exposition will be stronger, and the significance to other performance and artistic practices will be higher.

 

There is room for the author to give some more sense of their methodology in approaching the particular objects and actions they selected for the investigation. They indicate that they are objects in their immediate domestic environment, but there is room for further expansion on the qualities /properties of the different things.

 

The question of the camera and the relation of the performer / performance to the camera is introduced at the very end of the exposition – there is space for some further consideration of this, both of the camera as another object / thing in the performance space, and perhaps questions of the set-up of the performance situation, 'for' the camera, in the home. The camera is a necessary element of the dissemination of the research, but is it more than merely a tool of documentation?

 

The presentation of the exposition is clear and works well for the reader-viewer; the videos play automatically, and they can be paused if the reader wishes; the references are accurate and legible and relate clearly to the text. Overall the design is good.

 

The exposition will benefit from a small amount of editing for flow and fluency in written English.

 

Overall this is an interesting exposition, that potentially will sit well within the journal issue, bringing a specific clear consideration of an artist's practice into the theoretical and critical frame of the journal.

 

The presentation of the videos is good, the structure of the essay is clear, and the range of references and selection of examples works well.

 

I feel there is room for the author to expand somewhat on one or two of the video works, addressing questions of that object, that action, and that performance situation in the light of the thematic focus of the essay – feminist art practice and new materialist thinking. This will make clearer to the reader viewer how these works are being considered as research, as tests or investigations both toward future practice, but also in terms of exploring or gaining insight into how we and objects live and function together in the world.

 

The author might look to some other examples of practice, e.g. Bobby Baker's Kitchen Show - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RIbzhmljz_k - where the narrative developed around a specific set of objects puts them into a different frame in terms of both feminist practice, and in terms of materialist thinking. Or perhaps the work of Harrison and Wood, http://carrollfletcheronscreen.com/2014/04/23/wood-and-harrison/ in terms of how these artists work with things, and how they use the camera in making work 'for' and 'to' the video camera.

 

These additions will make for a richer exposition with wider relevance and will also allow the author to express in more detail or with greater clarity the processes of investigation they are undertaking.

Katriina Andrianov 21/05/2019 at 12:40

Seuraava vertaisarvio esitettiin tekijälle prosessin aikana ja on vaikuttanut lopulliseen ekspositioon. Se esitetään tässä hiukan editoituna.

 

Katriina Andrianov

 

Ekspositio kytkeytyy numeron teemaan ”Miten tehdä asioita esityksellä” erityisesti keskittyessään esiintyjän asemaan katsoja-kokijan esine- ja maailmasuhteeseen vaikuttajana, ja vastaa kirjoituskutsun haasteeseen erinomaisesti.

 

Jo eksposition otsikko on kiinnostavan monimerkityksinen. ’Objects’ – esineet, mutta myös kohteet ja ’matter’ – aine, materia. Pohdittaessa esineen merkitystä sekä ihmisen ja esineen suhdetta kohteena oleminen tai kohteeksi tuleminen on yksi ydinkysymyksistä.

 

Eksposition parasta antia on esineiden tuominen keskusteluun esitystaiteen kautta (aiemmin: esineteatterin tutkimus). Vaikka esine- ja nukketeatteritutkimuksessa tämän eksposition lyhyesti esittelemät käsitteet, esimerkiksi voima (agency), muutos ja toiseus, eivät uusia olekaan, niiden esiin nostaminen nimenomaan posthumanistisen uusmaterialismin viitekehyksessä on ehdottoman relevanttia.

 

Ekspositio on mielestäni kiinnostava taiteellisen tutkimusprojektin alkuidean esittelynä.

 

Oma taiteen tekeminen ei vielä näyttäydy isossa roolissa, minkä ymmärtäisin johtuvan projektin vaiheesta. Tällä en tarkoita, että videoiden sisällön pitäisi olla jotenkin runsaampaa tai että niissä pitäisi ns. tapahtua enemmän – tutkimuksellinen ja kokemuksellinen ote näkyy niissä kyllä. Tekstin viimeisessä osiossa, A study on objects, projektin reflektointi jää ohueksi, mikä turhaan pienentää kirjoittajan oman tutkimuksen roolia.

 

Aihe on ehdottomasti tutkimuksellinen luonteeltaan. Kirjoittajan mukaan työ on prosessissa, ja muotoja vielä haetaan. Ekspositioon valittu videointi herättää kysymyksen representaatioon siirtymisestä, minkä tekijä itsekin huomioi tekstin lopussa.

 

Ekspositio herättää suuren kiinnostuksen tutkimuksen etenemiseen ja loppupäätelmiin.

 

Ekspositiolla on teoreettisen viitekehyksensä ansiosta mahdollisuus avautua muihinkin kuin (esittävien) taiteiden tutkimussuuntiin. Haasteena voi olla tiukahko rajaus taidekontekstiin, mikä johtuu ko. julkaisuforumin tehtävästä.

 

Tutkimuskysymys on selkeästi eksplikoitu: kirjoittajan tarkoituksena on selvittää, miten suhteet ihmisen (hänen itsensä) ja arkielämän esineiden välillä syntyvät.

 

Tutkittava aihe on suhteutettu esitystaiteen kontekstiin, mikä sinänsä lienee uusi avaus ja sellaisena erittäin toivottava. Esine- ja (nukke)teatterintutkimuksen keskusteluihin ei viitata, vaikka niissä on pohdittu ekspositiossa esitettyjä ilmiöitä (esim. Teemu Paavolaisen kirjoitukset affordanssista, vrt. Kelan Alphabets of Performance Art, jota ekspositio esittelee).

 

Esitetty ei vielä tuota allekirjoittaneelle uutta tietoa, mikä johtunee taustastani. Menetelmät vaikuttavat luotettavilta, ja tutkija itse arvioi niiden riittävyyttä projektin edetessä.

 

Tekstin ja videoiden käyttö yhdessä on toimiva ratkaisu, sommittelu raikas. Teksti ei lähtökohtaisesti näy koko leveydessään ilman toimenpiteitä, tätä pidän häiritsevänä. Lähdeluettelo on ok, mutta tekstiä hieman raskauttaa sitaattien upottaminen sen sisään.

Väliotsikot selkiyttävät yleisilmettä. Englannin kielen kömpelyys vaikeuttaa paikoin lukemista, mutta suomalaisena lukijana pystyn seuraamaan ajatusta. Kielentarkastus on nähdäkseni välttämätön.

 

Vahvuudet:

 

Tärkeä ja ajankohtainen aihe! Menetelmä (arkielämän esineympäristöön tutustuminen yhdistettynä uusmaterialismin ja posthumanismin keskusteluihin) on relevantti.

 

Heikkoudet:

 

Osallistuminen keskusteluun jää (vielä) kirjallisuuden ja teosten listaukseksi.

 

Englannin kielessä puutteita perusrakenteiden tasolla.

 

Ehdotuksena:

 

Ihmismaterian ja muun materian suhdetta pohtivaa tekstiä voisi olla enemmänkin alkupuolella; perustelisi eksposition merkitystä sekä globaalilla että tämän numeron teeman tasolla.

 

Kielenhuolto tekee tekstistä paitsi ymmärrettävämmän myös vakuuttavamman. Myös sitaattitekniikka kannattaa katsoa läpi, jotta olisi yhdenmukainen läpi tekstin.

Comments are only available for registered users.


i have forgotten my password
join the research catalogue
Portals The research catalogue serves:
Journal for Artistic Research
a peer-reviewed international journal for all art disciplines
KC Research Portal
Research Portal of the Royal Conservatoire, The Hague
Norwegian Artistic Research Programme
The portal of the Norwegian Artistic Research Programme
RUUKKU - Studies in Artistic Research
Taiteellisen tutkimuksen kausijulkaisu / Studies in Artistic Research
University of Applied Arts Vienna
RC portal of the University of Applied Arts Vienna
Journal of Sonic Studies
A peer-reviewed, international journal on sound studies and auditory culture
Academy of Creative and Performing Arts
Portal of the Academy of Creative and Performing Arts, Leiden University
Faculty of Fine Art, Music and Design, University of Bergen
Portal of Faculty of Fine Art, Music and Design
Polifonia
Polifonia
Codarts
Portal of Codarts, University of the Arts, Rotterdam
Stockholm University of the Arts
Stockholm University of the Arts (Uniarts) provides education and conducts research in the fields of choreography, film & media, opera and performing arts.
University of the Arts Helsinki
University of the Arts Helsinki was launched in 2013 upon the merging of the Finnish Academy of Fine Arts, Sibelius Academy, and Theatre Academy Helsinki.
Norwegian Academy of Music
A leading artistic and academic university college with approximately 700 students. Located in Oslo, Norway.
The Danish National School of Performing Arts
This portal is a platform for distribution of knowledge produced through artistic research at the Danish National School of Performing Arts.
VIS – Nordic Journal for Artistic Research
VIS – Nordic Journal for Artistic Research
Rhythmic Music Conservatory Copenhagen
The portal of Rhythmic Music Conservatory Copenhagen
Konstfack – University of Arts, Crafts and Design
Konstfack – University of Arts, Crafts and Design, Stockholm