VII Final Conclusions
Research question: How can a study of passions and genuinity inform my performance of the Mad Songs of the late 17th century?
In my investigation of historically informed embodiment, I have allowed the historical understanding of the passions and the discussion of genuinity to guide my interpretation. This has led me to the field of rhetoric, visual art and acting. By using the Mad Songs as a musical tool to explore a broader palette of emotions, I have also explored the concept of madness in performance. As the artistic representation of madness in the Mad Songs is based in the perception of being possessed by passions, but this often limits the availability needed to sing the music, I have been forced to take a stand in the historical discussion of genuinity. This has been manifested in the experimentation of balancing the pure sensation of passions with their artistic representation and musical demands. And since “music speaks louder than words,”1 I have concluded that the response to the discussion of genuinity can only be found in the effects of its artistic representation. Only in the perception and experience of the artistic choices made, one feels the impact, and thus can decide upon the most effective balance.
With this exposition, I would like to bridge the gap between now and then. While the stylistic representation of emotions on stage has changed since the 17th century, I have experienced that the methods that were used to channel the true sensations of the passions are still applicable today. It is in the moment of transitioning from the privacy of one's own emotions, alone with oneself, to stepping onto the stage that I have discovered the crucial tension: What is the artistic manifestation of truly embodied passion? By delving into only certain aspects of what the late 17th-century Mad Singer would have encountered (while leaving out elements like historical gestures), my scenic representation becomes limited to the movements of my own stage persona. However, my study of the concept of madness and the Restoration Actresses has shown that my personal stage persona and a historically informed interpretation are not incompatible. Adopting the perspective of a Restoration actress, I have used my stage persona's presence as a way to connect with the imagination of the audience, and have thus shaped the sensation of the historically informed passions for the stage of today.
By choosing not to emphasize the stylized gestures when performing, I leave out parts of what is considered important when pursuing a historically informed interpretation. However, as Christopher Page emphasizes - research in the historically informed musical field is motivated by a desire to enrich one’s musicianship. He describes the Early Music movement as “the exercise of a musical imagination that is disciplined, but not ultimately constrained, by a body of historical evidence to which singers and players freely acknowledge a responsibility because they find it enhances their musicianship,”2 which I find very encouraging. Rather than developing an entirely new body language for myself based on historical, stylized gestures, I have sought to inform the one I already possess, expressing informed genuinity.
The rapid emotional shifts in the Mad Songs convey something beyond themselves. To achieve historical accuracy in this repertoire, one should not focus on emphasizing stylized body language, but on tracing the performance back to the core of the Mad Songs - the artistic representation of irrationality in the human mind. By allowing the cultural ideas and understanding of the passions in the time conduct the performance, one can access new and unpredictable ways of shaping the repertoire, which essentially deepens the interpretation, and more importantly, the madness.
A Serious Topic
In February 2025, I visited the Bedlam Royal Hospital and its archive. While in the institution's canteen, I caught myself wondering which of the other individuals might be the "mad" ones. I had become a visitor, a spectator—just like those in the 17th century. It was an uncomfortable feeling.
“(...) because the only people for me are the mad ones, the ones who are mad to live, mad to talk, mad to be saved, desirous of everything at the same time, the ones who never yawn or say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn like fabulous yellow roman candles exploding like spiders across the stars (...)”3
Footnotes:
1: A popular quote, used, for example, in a song with the same title by Peter, Paul and Mary, Payne/Pease/Scarpiello, Warner-Tamerlain & Crank Music (1982).
2: Page 2013, extract.
3: Kerouac 2011, p. 7