Research Catalogue

"My Public Stage" is not merely an artistic practice; it is a dynamic fusion of performance art and civic engagement that transcends conventional boundaries. At its core, this practice navigates the intricate relationship between the artist and the public sphere, offering an unconventional perspective on how art can reshape our understanding of the world. The essential aspect of this artistic journey lies in the intentional placement of artistic interventions and performances within public spaces, where the encounter with viewers is not a predetermined spectacle but a meeting. This deliberate approach seeks to dissolve the traditional separation between the artist and the individual, fostering a unique connection that is spontaneous and genuine. I view public space as not only a material but also a social environment that is produced, reshaped and restructured by the citizens through their experiences, their intentions for action and the relations they develop in it. My project draws on Lefebvre’s (2019) approach to urban public space not as a neutral container of social life, but as a fluid entity, both constructed and produced by social practices. Lefebvre’s approach confirms and expands my view that public space is not fixed, yet it requires a conscious effort to intervene in its production. The philosophy driving "My Public Stage" aligns with the concept of civic engagement. By presenting long durational performances in the heart of everyday life, the artist consciously assumes the role of a creator, using performance art as a medium to unveil the interconnected elements that bridge art with life. This philosophy echoes the sentiment of Joseph Beuys, who believed that everyone is an artist, actively sculpting the intricate sculpture we call life. In embracing the public sphere as its canvas, this practice transcends the conventional boundaries of art and daily reality. It becomes a catalyst for a different perspective on how individuals perceive and engage with their surroundings. The transformative power of performance art is harnessed to reveal the latent artistic potential within each person, emphasizing the symbiotic relationship between art and life.

The research explores 'ornamenting' as a transferable method in inter-disciplinary studies, inter-faith dialogues and artistic/therapeutic practices. Adapting techniques of Renaissance musicology, the processes we have developed de-create and re-create vital connections. It is a communica-tions strategy for times of crisis. Starting with simple sonic relations we extend the method far be-yond its traditional musical setting. The practice utilises 'Nothingness' as a component of creativity, providing a novel response to figurations of nothingness as mere negation. Preliminary results sug-gest its potential as a counter force to nihilism and social dislocation. The work divides into four areas. 1. Primary research on relationships between sound, meaning, and the sense(s) of self, exploring how sense is made of Otherness via processes akin to musical praxis: consonance, dissonance, 'pure voice' and ornamentation. 2. To apply this new perspective to a range of exile experiences – mourning, social disconnection, ex-communication and aggres-sive 'Othering'. 3. To investigate the cancelling of normal time-conditions in crisis situations such as trauma, dementia, and mystical experience, relating non-linear temporality to creative practice and healing. 4. To widely disseminate our results and methods as contributions to the methodology of artistic research via journal articles, live workshops and performances, and a book of original, praxical, testable, and teach-able interventions.

(EN) "Imperial coffe breaks" is a transdisciplinary seminar format that deals with challenges of perception and possible transformations of academic time and space, using a ritual as example of shared identities and multiplicities. A Greek coffee is a Turkish coffee, a Palestinian, Egyptian, Lebanese, Bosnian, Armenian, Cypriot and more. Grinded a bit more finely or a bit more roughly, served in a cup with or without a handle, with cardamon or not, with sugar or without. During our meetings we prepare and serve this coffee with the multiple “originalities”, while we discuss written and oral histories and practices around the beverage. Starting from the Ethiopian berry that spread with the Ottoman Empire, the bean that still holds a strong presence in Eastern Mediterranean, North Africa and the Balkans, the powder that comes to foam and its local variations, we will talk about other Empires, slavery, cargo boats, plantations, corporates and associations/meanings/roles/origins of coffee trade and consumption in our daily routines. As this kind of coffee is traditionally also served in memorials, we will inevitably discuss loss and grief. We will also talk about relations to the future through tasseography (cup reading divination) that is another strong tradition. We will look at epistemological effects, ways we construct truth and meaning and ways to work with random patterns. Finally, we will exercise cleaning up our mess after the gatherings. Through sharing and rotating the roles, we will practice rituals of togetherness and empathy, thinking with coffee and with each other, about the origins and futures of otherwise unremarkable things in our daily life. (DE) „Imperial coffe breaks“ ist ein transdisziplinäres Seminarformat, das sich mit den Herausforderungen der Wahrnehmung und möglichen Transformationen von akademischen Zeiten und Räumen befasst und dabei ein Ritual als Beispiel für gemeinsame Identitäten und Verschiedenheiten verwendet. Ein griechischer Kaffee ist ein türkischer Kaffee, ein palästinensischer, ägyptischer, libanesischer, bosnischer, armenischer, zyprischer, kurdischer. Etwas feiner oder etwas gröber gemahlen, in einer Tasse mit oder ohne Henkel, mit Kardamom oder ohne, mit Zucker oder ohne. Bei unseren Treffen bereiten wir diesen Kaffee mit den vielfältigen „Eigenheiten“ zu und servieren ihn, während wir über schriftliche und mündliche Überlieferungen und Praktiken rund um das Getränk diskutieren. Ausgehend von der äthiopischen Kaffeebeere, die sich mit dem Osmanischen Reich verbreitete, über die Bohne, die im östlichen Mittelmeerraum, in Nordafrika und auf dem Balkan nach wie vor stark vertreten ist, bis hin zum Pulver, das aufgeschäumt wird, und seinen lokalen Variationen, werden wir über andere Reiche, Sklaverei, Frachtschiffe, Plantagen, Unternehmen und Vereinigungen/Bedeutungen/Rollen/Ursprünge des Kaffeehandels und -konsums in unserem Alltag sprechen. Da diese Art von Kaffee traditionell auch bei Gedenkfeiern serviert wird, werden wir unweigerlich über Verlust und Trauer sprechen. Wir werden auch über die Beziehung zur Zukunft durch Tasseografie (Wahrsagen aus dem Kaffesatzlesen) sprechen, die eine weitere starke Tradition ist. Wir werden uns mit erkenntnistheoretischen Effekten befassen, mit der Art und Weise, wie wir Wahrheit und Bedeutung konstruieren, und mit der Art und Weise, wie wir mit zufälligen Mustern arbeiten. Schliesslich werden wir üben, nach den Versammlungen aufzuräumen. Durch das Teilen und das Rotieren der Rollen werden wir Rituale der Zusammengehörigkeit und Empathie praktizieren und mit Kaffee und miteinander über die Ursprünge und die Zukunft von ansonsten unauffälligen Dingen in unserem täglichen Leben nachdenken.

This essay establishes Post‑Interpretive Criticism as a formal break with the dominant aesthetic consensus of the late twentieth century, which treated meaning as something produced through mediation rather than encountered through structure. Surveying post‑1950 traditions across structuralism, hermeneutics, phenomenology, critical theory, and post‑structuralism, the essay identifies a shared assumption underlying their disagreements: interpretation functions as the necessary and ethically justified ground of meaning. Post‑Interpretive Criticism rejects this premise not by proposing an alternative theory of meaning‑production, but by questioning whether production itself is the correct frame. The essay argues that interpretation is not neutral, inevitable, or inherently liberatory, but structurally hazardous. Language, when introduced prematurely or excessively, alters the proportions of the aesthetic encounter, collapsing interval, crowding distance, and displacing presence with discourse. Meaning, on this account, does not originate in interpretation but in a relational field between work and witness that possesses structure prior to mediation. Interpretation is therefore recast as an intervention rather than a foundation—one that must justify itself ethically by preserving proportion rather than overwhelming it. Positioning Post‑Interpretive Criticism against the historical conditions that necessitated interpretive excess in the post‑war period, the essay argues that contemporary aesthetics now faces the inverse problem: interpretive saturation. Where interpretation once functioned as moral responsibility, it now frequently preempts encounter, substituting commentary for perception. Drawing careful distinctions from phenomenological aesthetics, the essay emphasizes that description of experience is insufficient without a discipline governing speech. Post‑Interpretive Criticism introduces restraint as method, silence as ethical posture, and proportion as evaluative criterion. The essay concludes by outlining the institutional, pedagogical, and critical consequences of adopting Post‑Interpretive Criticism, including reduced interpretive authority, contraction of discourse, and the re‑training of attention prior to articulation. It does not argue for universal application, but claims necessity under specific contemporary conditions. Interpretation, once required, is now placed at risk—not because meaning has vanished, but because the encounter has returned as the primary site of aesthetic responsibility. This entry is connected to a series of original theories and treatises forming the foundation of the Post-Interpretive Criticism movement (Q136308909), authored by Dorian Vale (Q136308916) and published by Museum of One (Q136308879). These include: Stillmark Theory (Q136328254), Hauntmark Theory (Q136328273), Absential Aesthetic Theory (Q136328330), Viewer-as-Evidence Theory (Q136328828), Message-Transfer Theory (Q136329002), Aesthetic Displacement Theory (Q136329014), Theory of Misplacement (Q136329054), and Art as Truth: A Treatise (Q136329071), Aesthetic Recursion Theory (Q136339843), The Journal of Post-Interpretive Criticism (Q136530009), Canon of Witnesses (Q136565881) Dorian Vale is a chosen pseudonym, not to obscure identity, but to preserve clarity of voice and integrity of message. It creates distance between the writer and the work, allowing the philosophy to stand unclouded by biography. The name exists not to hide, but to honor the seriousness of the task: to speak without spectacle, and to build without needing to be seen.

From the Gezi Park protests of 2013 onwards, Turkey has witnessed a troubling trajectory that reflects signs of an authoritarian dystopia —a word that might resonate with scholars of philosophy. This article interprets the variables of this authoritarianism, raising a question of law and exception on a local-global span. The modern panorama of Turkey presents an urgent case study for scholars examining the interplay between state power, civil liberties, and the public sphere.

This essay situates Post-Interpretive Criticism within the philosophical lineage of Pythagorean thought, arguing that both traditions uphold alignment, not interpretation, as the rightful posture toward truth. Drawing from the procedural structure of the seven liberal arts (trivium and quadrivium), the essay proposes a framework wherein aesthetic experience is not produced by commentary but preserved through restraint, ratio, and spatial ethics. The critic, like the Pythagorean listener, is not a performer of insight but a tuning instrument for fidelity. Geometry here is not symbolic but disciplinary. Harmony is not decoration but evidence of structural truth. Against the inflation of language in contemporary criticism, the essay defends the doctrine of restraint, articulated in the Post-Interpretive Lexicon as the ethical refusal to speak first, to dominate with explanation, or to distort the interval between viewer and work . By reanimating ancient principles of proportion, breath, and silent recognition, it positions criticism not as a pursuit of meaning but as a form of fidelity to what already holds its law. Using examples from art, music, architecture, and mathematics, the essay formalizes the alignment-based criteria for valid aesthetic response. These include grammatical clarity, logical coherence, rhetorical proportion, and quadrivial discipline, culminating in a methodologically grounded alternative to contemporary interpretive excess. Where most criticism seeks to explain the work, Post-Interpretive Criticism seeks to stand before it correctly. The work is not a message to decode, but a geometry to hold. The critic’s task is not verbal performance but spatial obedience. Truth, in this essay, is redefined not as insight delivered, but as harmony preserved. This entry is connected to a series of original theories and treatises forming the foundation of the Post-Interpretive Criticism movement (Q136308909), authored by Dorian Vale (Q136308916) and published by Museum of One (Q136308879). These include: Stillmark Theory (Q136328254), Hauntmark Theory (Q136328273), Absential Aesthetic Theory (Q136328330), Viewer-as-Evidence Theory (Q136328828), Message-Transfer Theory (Q136329002), Aesthetic Displacement Theory (Q136329014), Theory of Misplacement (Q136329054), and Art as Truth: A Treatise (Q136329071), Aesthetic Recursion Theory (Q136339843), The Journal of Post-Interpretive Criticism (Q136530009), Canon of Witnesses (Q136565881)